Re: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- Subject: Re: [GWL] New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- From: "Lon J. Rombough" l*@hevanet.com
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:57:28 -0800
- List-archive: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/gardenwriters>
Title: Re: [GWL] New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G People:
If you want to post about stories from newspapers, please just copy the story and post that directly. The sites for lots of these big newspapers have at least two serious pitfalls. One is that you have to join to be able to go in and read the article. That leads to spam. The other is that you'll be buried in cookies from the site. I set my web browser to allow me to reject cookies and the first time I went to the NY Times site, even WITHOUT joining, I fielded over two dozen cookies that would have given me tons more spam. If I want to do that, I'll go to Mrs. Fields'.
Spare the spam and help the list.
-Lon Rombough
Yo GWL gang. If you missed the article in the New York Times on March 13th
about the effect of big boxes on the independent garden centers, go to this
address.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/13/garden/13GARD.html?ex=1048906501&ei=1&en=9
c5a2396e9077870
_______________________________________________ gardenwriters mailing list gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters GWL has searchable archives at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters If you have photos for GWL, send them to gwlphotos@hort.net and they will show up at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- From: "L* J* R*"
- From: "L* J* R*"
- Re: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- References:
- New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- From: "J* B*"
- From: "J* B*"
- New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- Prev by Date: future of garden magazines
- Next by Date: Re: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- Previous by thread: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G
- Next by thread: Re: New York Times Article RE: Big Boxes in L&G