This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: another garden magazine ceases


The illustrations were gorgeous but it didn't go into enough depth to interest me. The articles were only 2 pages long and a lot of that was illustration.
 
Fran
 
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 21:26:47 EST KTCopsey@aol.com writes:
In a message dated 3/16/03 8:23:30 PM US Eastern Standard Time, ycunnington@sympatico.ca writes:

The Gardener was boring, I thought. It didn't offer anything I didn't already know or wasn't getting elsewhere. I didn't renew my subscription either.
 



Could this be because those of us that know about the stuff, write about it???.  Should we not be educatingt those that do not know?
What was the audience that it was trying ot attract?
 

Fran Gustman,  fgustman@juno.com
Editor, HortResources Newsletter
Editor, Wild Ones Journal,  www.for-wild.org
Boston, MA
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

If you have photos for GWL, send them to gwlphotos@hort.net and they will
show up at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index