Re: photography discussion

**"c*@netzero.net" c*@netzero.net**

Rich,
"but I read your initial email to say that 1) this case was a decision 
of law regarding authorization to photograph gardens, and 2) That it had a 
comprehensive discussion of the law. Neither is the case."
If this is how you interpreted my initial email, then it is I who didn't express myself well. Reading the decision makes it obvious that your statements above are true, and I didn't think that my initial email stated point 1 or 2 above.
I practiced law for 20 years. I was not suggesting that people read this case and jump to conclusions. As you are no doubt aware, every case stands on its own facts and no two are exactly alike. Every lawyer takes principles, findings and conclusions from other cases to argue his/her own. My intent was merely to stimulate discussion of the issue...not the fine points of legal procedure.

Carlo A. Balistrieri  (carlob@ridgewoodpower.com)
The Gardens at Turtle Point
79 Turtle Point Road
Tuxedo Park, NY 10987
Zone 6  (845.351.2049)
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
&quot;Gardenwriters on Gardening&quot; &lt;gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org&gt;

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters