Re: Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
- Subject: Re: [GWL] Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
- From: "Lon J. Rombough" l*@hevanet.com
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 11:30:28 -0800
- List-archive: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/gardenwriters/>
Title: Re: [GWL] Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs This was a prime example of something that we really need to watch. Lots of the list members are guilty of it, so don't any one person take this personally.
First, the comment added nothing to the list. It should have been made OFFLIST.
Second, the ENTIRE digest was included in the letter. That's going to add a real clog to the archives, and I CAN'T DELETE OR EDIT OUT MATERIAL FROM THE IBIBLIO ARCHIVES.
So PLEASE think about that old noise to content ratio, and EDIT the excess stuff off your postings.
-Lon Rombough
To: <gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [GWL] Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
That was priceless! :-))
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
- Next by Date: Re: Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
- Previous by thread: Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs
- Next by thread: Re: Re: gardenwriters digest, Vol 1 #195 - 2 msgs