Re: photog info - digital

**l*@klis.com**

Interesting discussion regarding digital versus traditional 
photography.

Saxon Holt wrote:
> However, in the world of editorial photographers, we shoot lots of images,
> not knowing which particular ones will work for any given publication. It is
> MUCH easier to look at and edit film on a light table.  It is not convenient
> for editors to review digital files. 

A service that works for myself and those I write for is my 
publishing a temporary page of low res pictures to my website to 
accompany a proposed article.  I then email the editor the URL.

Once they visit the site they have a good idea of what I have available, then 
they indicate their choice(s). I either burn those to a disc and courier 
them, FTP, or email them using a high speed service (after checking 
first to see that they also have high speed.)

Carla Allen
~An East Coast Gardener~
http://www.carlaallen.ca
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

If you have photos for GWL, send them to gwlphotos@hort.net and they will
show up at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos