hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: sports


We may be stumbling on semantics here.  What I mean by truly dormant buds'
are buds that rarely grow under any circumstances.  In a Hosta such a Sum &
Substance only a few of the buds that develop at the base of the plant
actually grow into shoots making this plant hard to propagate in the field.
BAP does cause more of these buds to go on and break than they would
normally.  If you remove the apical growing center (or damage it by
splitting the stem with a knife) you can get the same phenomena.

I do not disagree with you about the growers responsibility to sell good
plants to the public.  Bad plant are available, and they are often cheep, so
I do not see an end to the problem.

Jim Anderson

-----Original Message-----
From: RL <ranbl@netsync.net>
To: hosta-open@mallorn.com <hosta-open@mallorn.com>
Date: Sunday, August 15, 1999 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: sports

>James M. Anderson wrote:
>> Ran,
>> I am not sure I agree with you about the dormant bud observation.  All
>> in Hosta are dormant until they grow.  I am sure you know that Hosta
>> is typified by a lateral bud developing into a strong leader that we see
>> a shoot.
>Yes, It is part of what I teach in the Bud Isolation process.
>by adding BAP to the culture medium.  We
>> are not inducing the truly dormant axially buds (those that do not swell)
>> any more than natural growth does.
>That is intresting.  I am not sure where one differentiates between the
>"truly dorment buds" and "dorment buds".  It was my impression that the
>noton on the part of many who use "BAP" was that very dorment buds are
>being "pushed".
> Now, some technical stuff.  Under controlled conditions, TC should work
>> described in the above paragraph.  However, we do not live in an ideal
>> world.  The growth conditions that we provide the plants are, obviously,
>> perfect and we can get greedy and try to push the plants too hard
>> phytohormone concentrations and some other things).  Under these
>> we get what is called bud proliferation (hundreds of buds formed in a
>> which at the extreme are called bud balls).
>This phenomenon, has plegued the production of Rhododendrons also.  In
>fact to the point where some Tc production of them was stopped a few
>years ago.  I sometimes get hostas where this seems to be taking place
>long after they are out of the lab.  I also believe I have induced the
>process chemically in my garden.
> The amount of bud proliferation
>> is variety dependent, and is most often seen on new explants.  It can be
>> easily missed if not watched for.  This technique is used in many plants
>> get mass production of the plant (Bananas for example).  When we grew
>> venus fly traps we could get up to 250 plants from a single jar.  Hosta
>> would be a lot less expensive if we could use this technique.  It is a
>> danger in Hosta production (and probably day lilies as well) because it
>> leads to so many off types.  We discard any cultures that form any bud
>> proliferation. Even a small amount of proliferation (which can be hard to
>> see) can really mess up a line.
>> I know that as a lab gets large, it can get harder to control the
>> that can lead to problems (such as bud proliferation), and some labs
>> do not seem to care that much about product.
>That is exactly my contention , and the reason for my notion that what
>needs to be said of Tc is that there are many more "sports" than one in
>ten thousand and as a result some may get through to the grower.  Many
>growers seem to be operating under the thinking that they have only to
>rush a plant to market , and take the resulting profits.  Somewhere we
>are (in some cases) loosing the idea, that the ultimate responsibility
>for marketing the correct plant , belongs to the grower/retailer.
>In the Hosta business, you can
>> end up with a mess if you let things get out of hand.  I am amazed at
what I
>> see at the Horticultural trade shows.  All yellow Francis Williams, So
>> with a very thin variegation, and that yellow Gold Standard.  I could go
>> but you get the point.  Do not get me wrong, I am not bad mouthing the
>> Hosta labs that you are familiar with, but there are many other labs
>> (foreign and domestic) that are beginning to produce Hosta with mixed
>> results.  How does a lab in India (I am not picking on one country here)
>> know how to cull a Hosta that will not even grow there?
>Many of us had this problems with Holland labs, to the point where I
>simply gave up on them.
>>  I agree with you that it is the responsibility of the TC lab to produce
>> culled plants, but that is an ideal that will probably not be reached in
>> today's market.  The nature of TC will produce some bad plants from time
>> time, and I wait in fear for the time that I sell something that is
>> not true to form.
>> Jim Anderson
>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index