Discussion on Origin of Sports
- To: hosta-open@mallorn.com, h*@atlantic.net, h*@open.org
- Subject: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- From: J* H*
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:00:38 -0500
Hosta Scholars All,
As promised I will begin our informal discussion on the subject at hand.
Joe Halinar has asked me to copy to him current messages thru hosta-open
because he is on digest service and there may normally be a delay in
communication for him..
We are reviewing the technical aspects of three articles on the orign of
sports authored by Ben Zonneveld. Each is different in some respects but
have a common message, i.e. that there are three causes of sports. I
will list these causes in the order that they are listed by Ben.
Mitotic Recombinations
Chimeral Rearrangements
Nuclear Mutations.
When Ben's last article was written, I prepared a critiqe on May 24,
1999. I sent it to hosta-open for comments. It raised little concern.
The issues are still unresolved...that there is incorrect information
being published in the AHJ. I will repeat the critique in a simplified
form so that readers will get a feel for the technical nature of the
points that I was trying to make. They still remain and warrant
discussion, for educational purposes if for no other reason. A shorter
redacted version of my critique follows:
Robins,
I am urged to comment on a recent article written in the Hosta Journal
Vol.30.1 by Associate Professor Ben Zonneveld in which he tries to
develop a rationale for his theory for the causes for sports. While the
causes for sports might normally interest only other Geneticists, I
find the
article so faulty that a response seems appropriate to correct some
misrepresentations.
He raises questions...Are they really identical or only similar? Should
they have different names if they are only similar? If they are
identical, could they have a single name? He hopes to answer these
questions by focusing on justification of names by discussing his
theory that there are three causes for hosta sports, i.e. (1) mitotic
recombination, (2) chimeral rearrangement and (3) mutations. He states
that "for our purposes we will treat mitotic recombination and
mutations as processes that mainly take place in the DNA of nucleus and
not in the DNA present in the other organelles of the cell" , (the
plastids, for example).
The faults I find in the article is that it is self-serving, it is
biased, it is incomplete and it is in error in many repects. There is
no
literary review to discuss the work and the views of other workers in
this
field. It does not discuss the histological basis for chimeras, the
"tunica-corpus" organization of cell layers in the meristem( after
Schmidt 1924), nor the identification of the two-three layer apices
common in monocots according to Stewart and Dermen (1979). He ignores
the
need for discussing "apical initials" within each apical layer of the
meristem. He does not discuss the fact that when cells from an inner
layer (L2 , for example) which take over the position of cells from
the
outer layer, "displacement" occurs, while "replacement" occurs when a
periclinal division of a cell occurs allowing for layer switching (per
Stewart and Dermen 1970).
He does not mention the work of Dr. Michael Marcotrigiano, world
authority on chimeras and Associate Professor of the Dept. of Plant
Science, Univ. of Mass., Amherst, who explains how plastid mutations
leads to variegation because of the growth and distribution of
heteroplastidic cells. Marcotrigiano states that "the most common
cause
of chimeral variegation is spontaneous mutation in the pathway of
chlorophyll synthesis or plastid morphology. These mutations are
generally chloroplast mutations rather than nuclear mutations".
Marcotrigiano then explains the genetic rationale for these
conclusions.
Ben does not discuss the distribution and sorting out of mutated
plastids in cells, as described by many workers. Nor does he discuss
plastid mutations that often
take place during various stages of embryogenesis according to
Tilney-Bassett.
Thus, the background of cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic factors are not
covered to explain their role in chimeras. His theory is contrary to
the
views of classical research workers in this field (Schmidt,
Stewart and Dermen, Tilney-Bassett, Vaughn and Marcotrigiano).
The author states "that for our purposes, we will not consider DNA
changes in the organelles of cells(the plastids). This statement seems
suspect and inappropriate in a scientific discussion. Is it not the
purpose of a scientific inquiry to look at all causes of phenomena
under study? If the purpose is to consider only the author's views and
theories, is not the discussion slanted, biased and incomplete at the
outset?. Why has not Ben reviewed the scientific literature? Why has he
not mentioned Vaughn's work on plastid mutations and cytoplasmic
inheritance? We will do so as our discussion proceeds in future days.
If the purpose of Ben's article was to inform readers of the
scientific facts by use of his theory, I must say I find his arguments
incomplete, in error on several occasions, biased and non-convincing.
Jim Hawes
-----------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
................................................................................................................
Back to our discussion...............
If readers wish to get even more backgound on scientifc achievements
regarding chimeras in Hostas, I suggest you go to the Webpage of First
Look of Region One which has become famous in recent days. Carol
Brashear and her seven dwarf helpers have posted the article written by
Dr. Kevin Vaughn "Chloroplast Mutants in Hostas from the AHS Bulletin
11 This is a classical work of research in Hosta . Please don't miss
reading it. I want to personally thank Carol for this help in getting
information for all to read. I will attempt an interpretation and
summary of this very important work the next time I enter the
discussion....perhaps tomorrow. Meanwhile you are invited to put in
your two cents worth of observations, opinions and facts. . Feel
free...we are open for discussion.
Jim Hawes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN