Re: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- To: hosta-open@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- From: G*@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:34:05 EST
- Content-Disposition: Inline
Jim, would you like the critique published as a letter to the editor or
refined into an article? I remind everyone that in Volume 31, Number 1, on page 72, I stated the following: "I am a firm believer in the theory that knowledge grows from a dialectic process, in which someone posits a theory or thesis, which is then either proved or disproved through the use of scientific method. The result, which some call the antithesis, results in the development of knowledge. (I like to simplify this process as: thesis + antithesis = knowledge.) Thus, there may well be some observational presentations in The Hosta Journal with which you disagree. It is my hope that this disagreement instills in you the desire to provide your own proof (or theory) and an explanation of how that proof was derived, so that we all might benefit from this sharing of information and reach our own conclusions." In this vein, I encourage the discussion that Jim is beginning. I am attempting to contact Kevin Vaughn so that, at the very least I can forward materials to him for comment. In the past, he has requested that his involvement be only in a review and comment mode and has asked confidential treatment of e-mail and phone numbers and I intend to respect the request he has made of me to not divulge them to anyone under any circumstances. Kevin P. Walek |
- Prev by Date: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- Next by Date: Daylily/hosta rust for those who have asked?
- Prev by thread: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- Next by thread: Re: Discussion on Origin of Sports