Reversions
- To:
- Subject: Reversions
- From: B* M*
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:44:21 -0500
I
suppose
> this could be determined today with modern science being what it is, but it > wouldn't be easy. It would probably be safer to call it a sport until proven > otherwise. Hi Bill Are you trying to say all variegated plants that turn back green should be considered sports until proven otherwise or for some reason just Joe's. I meant this to apply to all apparent
reversions. As Jim Hawes said, a reversion is a type of sport in which the
original tissue reappears. I'm just making the point that they are not
necessarily what they seem. I couldn't guess at what percentage are actually the
appearance of a new but similar- looking tissue, but there are more of these
than most people seem to think. They aren't interesting or exciting to most
people, so are just written off and forgotten as oddities. In the Kevin Vaughn
article posted at the First Look website, he mentions a 'Frances Williams' with
a twisted scape. This is the sort of thing I am referring to. If a plant like
Joe's that was dismissed as a reversion then sent up a twisted scape it
would be apparent that it was not the return of the original tissue in the
center, but the appearance of something new.
Hostas produce more sports than
are readily apparent. Many are just not noteworthy.
.......Bill Meyer
|
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussion on Origin of Sports
- Next by Date: Re: E-mail address........
- Prev by thread: Discussion of the causes of sports
- Next by thread: Re Discussion on Origin of Sports