Re: Glad to Be Back!
- To: hosta-open@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Glad to Be Back!
- From: C*@AOL.COM
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 03:20:21 EST
In a message dated 2/12/1999 2:45:06 PM Central Standard Time,
itjohnsn@execpc.com writes:
<<
> What exactly are we supposed to do with all the information on both
> sides of the alleged plagiarism? The AHS can apply certain sanctions, I
> suppose, not us. I think plagiarism is a tort, not a crime; thus the
> complainant needs to show financial loss in order to seek money damages
> (in the World Court?). The postings I read yesterday were almost
> embarrassing because one of the parties is so overmatched. Enough
> already, please.
> >>
###################################################################
Glad to see you back!
What are we supposed to do? Take a stand. Certainly you, of all people, would
disapprove of plagiarism.
I think you had better get some legal advice. The "World Court" only hears
cases in disputes between nation states.** Plagiarism is neither a tort nor a
crime, per se. Copyright infringement is actionable under a federal statute.
So glad you are back,
Clyde Crockett z5
** The International Court of Justice(the "World Court") may render Advisory
Opinions, requested by authorized agencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
