hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: Hosta 'Cathy's Clown'

  • Subject: RE: Hosta 'Cathy's Clown'
  • From: michael shelton <wilddog_202@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:39:10 -0700 (PDT)

There is a process for plant registration and it is
not controled by the Hosta Society. The rules are not
for growers, owners, or consumers.

--- Rod Kuenster <Rod-Kuenster@iowa-city.org> wrote:
> Hi Chick and all, I will have to totally agree with
> you on this Chick. There
> needs to be a much better way to go about naming and
> registering hosta. I
> believe that is why there are so many hosta
> introduced that are not ready to
> be. We need to grow these plants to full size before
> they are introduce.
> Maybe there could be a three step program, first you
> could submit the name,
> then the information about the plant and introduce
> it after full grow? I am
> not sure of how to get this done, but I think that
> the AHS needs to change
> things to make this process help the public out that
> is going to buy these
> plants, and want to know as much about them as
> possible. Just my 2 cents
> worth. Rod Kuenster
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chick [mailto:chick@bridgewoodgardens.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:28 AM
> To: hosta-open@hort.net
> Subject: Re: Hosta 'Cathy's Clown'
> Ok, you got me started anyway.
> It is my understanding that the name 'Cathy's Clown'
> becomes official 
> when it is registered or when it is published and
> the plant is described 
> in a printed catalog.  This last may have been
> changed, but if so, I 
> don't know about it.
> I suggested long ago that there be a system for name
> reservation, as 
> there is for daylily registrations (or at least
> there was when I was a 
> member of that society long ago).  There process had
> limits and 
> restrictions and seemed relatively simple to me.  If
> the plant was not 
> introduced withn a limited time, the reservation was
> void.  I know that 
> some will say that this will lead to all the good
> names being reserved, 
> and I can only respond that it seems to me that this
> is already 
> happening, except that people now have to find a
> plant to register in 
> order to get the name.  There seems to be a
> competition to get the first 
> and last hosta names, and if you register a plant
> named 'Aaaaaaaaaaaah', 
> I will just have to find a plant to name
> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah' so I can 
> be the first listed until you find something to name
> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah'.  What's the
> limit, 35 letters?
> I give my plants names long before I decide to
> introduce them, simply 
> because it is easier for me to remember 'Cathy's
> Clown' than "980205" or 
> some such nonsense.  If other people see the plant
> among my seedlings, 
> there is no way they will remember a number.  If, as
> has happened in 
> many cases, someone else registers the name before I
> am ready to do 
> anything with the plant that's just my hard luck and
> I have to think of 
> another name. Some obviously disagree with me, but I
> don't think that 
> selection, naming, and registration should
> necessarily all happen at the 
> same time.  'Cathy's Clown' has been named for
> several years, the plant 
> was shown at First Look 3 years ago.  But it just is
> not time to 
> introduce or register the plant.  I can come up with
> another name if I 
> have to.  The point is that this plant should be
> under my control until 
> I say it's time to distribute it.  I have never sold
> the plant to anyone 
> and have never authorized anyone else to sell it. 
> I want to emphasize again that I am not faulting
> Hilltop for selling the 
> plant.  But just because it was done unknowingly,
> doesn't mean that it 
> can go any farther.  There is really no way to stop
> anyone from doing 
> whatever they want, but as far as I'm concerned the
> plant that was sold 
> is not my 'Cathy's Clown' unless I say so, and if it
> is sold under that 
> name again, I'll just have to find another name for
> the real plant.  And 
> I will not do so quietly.
> Chick
> Richard Jolly wrote:
> >But Chick, What if I want to name my "special"
> plant "Cathy's Clown"? If
> >it's not registered or patented what stops anyone
> from naming their plant
> >the same name. I wonder what lab did your
> original????????
> >
> >Richard
> To sign-off this list, send email to
> majordomo@hort.net with the
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index