hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Fw: Registration

Once again, I want to remind everyone that I am just having a little fun with Bill.
I totally disagree with him, but I hope most of you can see that I'm just joking
around a bit.  I say this because right about now I usually start getting e-mails
telling me to quit being such an awful person.


Chick wrote:

> Hi again Bill.
> I've read through our messages again and I think I can see why we don't see this
> in the same way.  You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
> I tried to go through your message and note all the mis-statements, errors,
> fantasies, and just plain dunderheaded nonsense, but I was simply overwhelmed.
> So, the best I can do is simply make a list of all the things I can think of, in
> the limited amount of time available, that you should know before you go on.
> 1, Your initial statement that there are no new interesting hostas being
> introduced is utter nonsense.  Mary, would you like to whop him upside the
> head?  "Stuck in a
>  rut of endless variations of the same old thing"?  If you want something
> different than variations on the same old hostas, try perennial gardening.
> Hostas are hostas and First Look is not going to come up with some hitherto
> unknown cache of revolutionary new plants, unlike anything else we've ever
> seen.  It may come up with one, two, maybe even ten, though I doubt it, but if
> those plants are truly revolutionary, they would be discovered and put up for
> sale anyway.  If everyone is so sick of all these boring new introductions, what
> do you think we're doing with them all.  We're selling them, that's why there
> are more and more of them every year.  Not every one is a jewel, but if you
> can't find enough interesting plants among all the new ones being introduced to
> keep you going, then you need to find a new hobby.
> 2, You totally dismiss the fact that, for the most part, the tc labs will
> determine what is sold.  Certainly a couple of breeders and nurseries may make
> arrangements for these exclusive deals that you envision, but what great benefit
> is that to the world of hostas?  Exclusive deals keep availability limited, keep
> price up, and as far as I can see, in no way benefit the consumer.  I'm not
> against them, but if I get one it's for my benefit not yours.  The best way for
> plants to be distributed, strictly from the customers point of view, is through
> the tc labs.  Quickly, cheaply and by the thousands.
> I do not grow most of my plants from tc.  The vast majority of my plants are
> propagated by division of my own stock.  But new plants can be produced faster
> and more cheaply by the labs, and except for those few that can't be done, the
> vast majority will continue to be produced that way.  If I had one of the great
> new plants that you are expecting to come out of First Look, I'd be making my
> exclusive arrangement with a tc lab, not Bridgewood Gardens.
> 3.  Very few hosta nurseries can generate the volume necessary to make an
> exclusive arrangement with a breeder worthwhile, except in cases where the
> breeder is not interested in getting the best return for his plant.  Certainly
> there are breeders who don't care about making money with their plant, but if
> they do, most nurseries can't sell enough to make it worthwhile.  A few can, and
> they will probably benefit as you envision.  The rest of us will just keep doing
> things the way we always have.
> 4.  And lastly,
> Bill Meyer wrote:
> >  The issue is exclusive new introductions, not new plants to the catalog.
> > You know, that "bragging rights" thing? The ones that have the big star next
> > to them that means "available only from us"? That's what we're talking
> > about.
> Why is that the issue?  Who said it was the issue? The vast majority of hosta
> producers have muddled through for years without depending on exclusive new
> introductions.  My customers buy far more of those old run of the mill new
> introductions from the labs, that I can offer at what I think is a reasonable
> price (though I guess that's open for discussion) than they do of my
> introductions.  The only effect I can see that your new marketing method will
> have is to get prices of newer plants back up to where they were before the labs
> started producing plants quickly and cheaply.  I'm not a cheerleader for the
> labs, frankly I would prefer that anything I put out remain under my control.
> Your vision of Hosta World would be fine with me, assuming I could get my hands
> on some of these new exclusives.  I'm not saying it wouldn't be good for my
> business, I'm just saying it isn't likely to happen.
> >         That's where having Seedling and Sport Competitions can change
> > things. Nurseries can see a wide range of new seedlings and sports and
> > arrange with the originators to market them. If nurseries want to have
> > exclusive new only-available-from-us plants and not battle with each other
> > selling the same plant with different names then they have to get a look at
> > what's out there.
> I say again, Bill Meyers, you should be ashamed of yourself.  You have focused
> on the few instances where actions by some producers have resulted in what you
> portray as outrageous frauds on the hosta buying public, and made up a scenario
> of how the business of selling hostas works - unscrupulous  producers conspiring
> to introduce the same old plant over and over, controlling the market to insure
> that wonderful new developments never see the light of day -  and you have made
> up a vision of how you think it will work after First Look changes everything,
> and neither one have any relationship to the real world.
> >        Damn, I was going to keep arguing about this but your post just came
> > in saying you agree with me. That's not fair!
> I agreed with you on one small issue that had nothing to do with the current
> conflict.  Kind of like the Palestinians and Jews agreeing that they have
> nothing against the Swedes.
> > Make some more outrageous
> > statements.
> Not a problem.
> Chick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index