hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Origin of Sports

Dear Kay Dye, and others interested in sports,
This is the second e-mail I mentioned which was sent to Hosta Friends on
Mar. 30 1997. I answered several questions raised by Kay.

Jim Hawes wrote:
> Dear Kay,
> On Easter Sunday morning you wrote a message to honza raising some very
> key questions about sports. To my knowledge, no one has yet answered all
> of your questions. You asked about the origin of sports; what caused
> sports to arise?; did genetic changes take place?; if two sports arise
> about the same time in two geographical locations and are similar in
> appearance, are they close genetically? and do we need more sports? The
> last question is very easy. Of course we need more sports!
> But what a great series of questions. I will try to answer them as best
> I can. The following presentation about the origin of sports is compiled
> mostly from articles and talks I have prepared previously...a cut and
> paste effort. If it does not flow, blame it on the glue.
> Sports are new, different looking plants that arise from buds of parent
> plants. Differences are largely in coloration of leaves. Let's look at
> the differences from the histological (tissue and cellular level)
> viewpoint. Color differences occur because  the mix of plastids (and
> their corresponding pigments) in cells change. The change in plastids
> occurred because of several possible phenomena. These include:
>    Mutations of DNA in chromatin material of the nucleus of cells
>    Mutations of DNA material in the plastids themselves
>    Cell division and differentiation phenomena that create variegation
> patterns in    leaves
>    Shifts in tissue layers that create changes in variegation patterns
>    (known as chimeral aberrations)
>    Crossingover of chromosomes during mitosis (somatic cell division)
> creating new    combination of genes in affected chromosomes which may
> influence plastid types and    numbers (known as recombinants)
>    Overgrowth of one tissue layer over another creating new color
> patterns    (reversions, or sporting back to original forms)
>    Mutations of DNA in mitochondria may cause changes in vigor but not
> necessarily in    color.
> The above listed histological and genetic causes of sporting are my own
> opinions based upon rather comprehensive study of the subject of sports.
> They differ somewhat from the views of Ben Zonneveld as presented in his
> Journal Article "Mutations, Recombinations, Sports and Chimaerae"(see
> Vol.27, No.1), but not significantly.
> But how do these sports start in the buds in the first place? An
> understanding of histological growth and development of cells and
> tissues in the meristem is fundemental if one is to understand the
> phenomenon of variegation and sporting in Hostas.
> If we were to examine with a microscope a lateral section of the
> meristematic dome tissue in the minute growing point of a growing Hosta
> shoot, we would find that the growing point is composed of three
> parallel layers of cells. The first layer of cells (L1) is the epidermal
> layer. The second (L2) is the sub-epidermal layer of cells. The third
> layer (L3) is not involved in growth and development of leaf tissue.  In
> each layer of cells, only a few cells divide continually producing other
> cells which then differentiate into functional tissues such as leaf
> primordia (new tiny leaves) and bud primordia (new tiny lateral buds in
> axils of new leaves). According to work of Dermen (1960) in monocots,
> cells of L1 origin develop into epidermal and border tissue of the leaf.
> Cells of L2 origin differentiate into tissue occupying the central
> portion of the leaf, streaked tissue of the flower scapes and ovary
> tissue inside of flower buds. Cells of L3 origin differentiate into
> tissue in the rest of the plant, such as rhizome and root tissue.
> If the DNA contained in a chloroplast in a specific dividing cell in L1
> mutates to create a different set of enzymes, amino acids and proteins
> that affect the chloroplast, it may change and grow in numbers. If the
> cell containing these new plastids then divides several
> times,differentiates and demonstrates new genetic characteristics, it
> may develop into  border tissue of the tiny primordial leaf with a color
> different from its parent. A plastid mutation has create a new leaf
> sport. L2 tissue has remained the same. Only L1 tissue has changed. An
> axillary primordial bud grew simultaneously as the primordial leaf grew.
> It has identical tissue as the primordail leaf (It has border tissue
> with plastids that have changed as a result of the plastid DNA
> mutation). If it ever grows, it will be identical in appearance to the
> leaf sport which we observed.
> Another scenario is that the chromatin material in the nucleus of a
> critical cell in L2 mutated to create other major changes in the
> plastid's types or numbers. Perhaps the changes were even more drastic
> than the previous example.  Controlling enzymes, amino acid and new
> proteins might cause the previous chloroplast to self- destruct, thus
> reducing the amount of chlorophyll a and b in the cell where the nuclear
> mutation occurred. As the cell divides, differentiates and grows into a
> part of the leaf primordial tissue, the leaf may grow to have a central
> portion with less chlorophyll than the rest of the leaf.The resulting
> primordial leaf has developed into a medio-variegated form. Since the
> primordial axillary bud at the base of the leaf originated from the same
> original mutating cell, it is identical genetically and, if it grows in
> the future, leaves from the bud will be identical in appearance to the
> leaf sport. The plot has become very complicated, has it not, Kay?
> These are only two scenarios, but we could continue and develop others
> to explain  all of the various histological and genetic causes of sports
> mentioned previously. To do so would make this presentation extremely
> complex and long. I would prefer to postpone a discussion of some of the
> causes to another occasion....for example, when we get into tissue
> culture aberrations, that would be the better time to discuss Chimeras
> as causes of sports.
> Some of your questions are yet unanswered. What causes these sports that
> may be the result of nuclear or plastid mutations of DNA? It is well
> known that mutagens of various types cause changes in the structure of
> the long organic molecule that comprises DNA. These mutagens could be
> chemicals, biological agents, physical shocks of various kinds and
> radiation particles, such a X-rays, gamma rays, beta rays, cosmic rays,
> ultra-violet light rays and perhaps others. Mutagens change the sequence
> of constituent components of the DNA molecules. Changes in sequence
> produce different enzyme, amino acid and protein end products in the
> cells giving them different characteristics. This is a very simplistic
> explanation but is perhaps adequate at our current level of discussion.
> What about sports that occur almost simultaneously at different
> geographical locations? Are they identical? A correct answer to this
> question would be very speculative. A correct answer could only be
> determined by comparative testing and observations of the sports
> involved. We don't have experiment stations set up to do this
> investigations.  The obvious alternative is what we are presently doing,
> comparing notes with each other, growing similar sports side by side (as
> I am doing with 'September Sun','Lunar Orbit' and 'Lunar Magic'), and
> reporting on similar sports when we find them. All of this is
> interesting and fun. An understanding of the phenomenon of sports helps
> it become even more fun, don't you think?
> I hope this discussion has been interesting and helpful. I few details
> may be somewhat controversial but we can discuss all of these details in
> time to have even a better understanding of what is happening down
> inside of the meristem, into the cells, along side the plastids, and
> even into the DNA molecules themselves. Happy Easter everyone!
> Jim Hawes
> Oakland MD
> hawesj@miworld.net...now <hawesj@gcnet.net>
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index