This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Rugosa
- To: <r*@eskimo.com>
- Subject: Re: Rugosa
- From: "* A* <d*@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:42:15 -0700
- Resent-Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 08:37:57 -0700
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"JiRVy2.0.yP4.KtSor"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
"Midas Touch" is NOT a rugosa! It is a Hybrid Tea, and an AARS winner in
1994.
-Dave-
-----Original Message-----
From: lowery@teamzeon.com <lowery@teamzeon.com>
To: rose-list@eskimo.com <rose-list@eskimo.com>
Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: Rugosa
>
>
>
>
>Valerie Lowery@ZEON
>08/06/98 09:06 AM
>
>May I add my 2 cents to this topic? After growing teas in this awful
>summertime climate here in Zone 6a (hot, hazy, humid), I was going to give
>up roses completely due to numerous disappointments with blackspot, aphids,
>et al. Now that I have rugosas, gardening is once again a pleasant
>experience. No spraying, no bugs, no problems. I don't water them more
>than anything else in my garden, I don't fertilize them other than once a
>year with a slow-release formula, and they will bloom like gang busters
>every year. This year, being a cool, wet spring, I actually have had
>repeat blooms from my rugosas. Talk about happiness!
>
>The only disappointment I've add is with 'Midas Touch', a yellow rugosa
>that has succumbed to blackspot occasionally. This is it's last year
>because I have no tolerance for coddling plants along through the summer.
>It's a losing battle that I don't have the time nor patience to fight.
>
>Any other roses perform like the rugosas?
>
>Val in KY
>zone 6a
>
>
>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index