This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
RE: Salt dough cookies. - Listowner
- To: r*@eskimo.com, "'J. Barker'" <j*@vic.ozland.net.au>
- Subject: RE: Salt dough cookies. - Listowner
- From: "* D* G* <D*@PSS.Boeing.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 05:55:31 -0800
- Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 05:56:54 -0800
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"xatb_1.0.nn1.cSKPs"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
Thank you for your comments. YES, PRIVATE messages should be sent to the
author of a post, not the whole mailing list. This is the biggest problem
with the internet today. You get all these new people online and they find
a chat room or two and they think the mailing list follows the same ground
rules. This is not ture. I basically makes me mad.
I really do not want to see any personal chat on the mailing list unless it
is within the scope of the mailing list. The reason why you signed on is to
discuss roses.
To unsubscribe:
http://www.backyardgardener.com/rose.html
> ----------
> From: J. Barker
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 1998 10:35 PM
> To: rose-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: Salt dough cookies.
>
> Is this a rose list or a general chat list? Can I suggest that postings
> be
> kept to the topic - someone's surgery is surely not a topic for the whole
> world to read about. Private postings should be kept private. I did not
> subscribe to this list to read about such things ... from Janine
>
> At 08:20 PM 30/11/1998 +1000, you wrote:
> >We made the cookies on the weekend and they turned out splendidly.Perhaps
> I
> >over cooked them as they were a little brown, but as we will paint them,
> it
> >doesnt matter.
> >Welcome to the new lady who makes toiletries( sorry I deleted message
> before
> >I got your name!)
> >Id love to know how to make some of those things, they would make great
> >gifts.
> >Thanks Mia
> >
> >
>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index