This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Some non-Antiques are very hard to find!!
- To: r*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: Some non-Antiques are very hard to find!!
- From: P* W* <p*@televar.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 17:51:55 -0700
- References: <3.0.1.32.19980630133556.00bd2398@ruf.rice.edu>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 18:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"I2rWg.0.Md.igOcr"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
William M. Groth wrote:
> What does everyone think about this difficulty in finding somewhat recent
> past
> roses?
Hi!
It makes me feel like an antique too because I think I remember some of the roses
that were available in the 1950's. There was a retired USFS employee who grew
the most fabulous roses, mostly HT's, which had a great scent and I wish I could
find them again.
I remember a couple of miniature roses from only about 20 years ago that do not
seem to be available anywhere anymore. I think the roses from that time period
were taller than those of today. I have some that I have grown in my yard for
about ten years that are quite tall, 18", and they may have grown taller because
they were well established so I wonder if anyone knows the real story on them? I
just got "Secrets of the Miniature Rose" by Elizabeth Abler and I expect that I
will find some of the answers there when I have more time to read more than a
page or so at a time.
Patti Wenham
Omak, WA
USA
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index