This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
RE: Yellow roses -Reply
- To: r*@eskimo.com
- Subject: RE: Yellow roses -Reply
- From: S* S* <S*@Schwabe.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:26:14 -0800
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:23:38 -0700
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"-WZ0B.0.0j6.Pm4Rr"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
Carleen wrote:
I love Graham Thomas's color but, your
description of Golden Celebration sounds
wonderful.
(larger/fuller,great fragrance,butterscotchish)
Do you have both roses on your place ?
Yes. Golden Celebration is nearly at peak now.
Which has the better Bush ?
At this point GC is smaller, and GT is tall, as
you know (I always have to have a few stakes
inserted strategically). GT's flowers grow in
larger clusters (more flowers per stem), too, I
would say.
Where did you get Golden Celebration?
Oh my impatience will show -- got it at
Portland Nursery on grafted stock last year.
Heirloom does not list it in there catalog ?
If not, I'm sure they'll get it soon. It really is
lovely.
---------
> From: SUSAN SAXTON
> A new rose to me this year (planted last
year)
> that has "come into its own" this year is
> 'Golden Celebration' by David Austin. It is a
> deeper golden yellow that 'Graham Thomas,'
> perhaps larger/fuller, too. Really beautiful
and
> great fragrance. More butterscotchish (how's
> that for a made up color?).
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index