This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: [SANS] Sansevieria sp. 'Horwood'
- To: S*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SANS] Sansevieria sp. 'Horwood'
- From: h* <h*@ENDANGEREDSPECIES.COM>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:44:50 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <19151900001716@naplesnet.com>
At 07:25 PM 11/13/97 -0500, chahinian wrote:
>Commenting on John Gamesby's letter (11-11-97):
>
>A plant, even if it is known as being field collected, can be described
>with a cultivar name, so Sansevieria sp. 'Horwood' (Sansevieria should be
>written in italics) is a valid name according to the rules of the
>International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
>
>Though, to my thinking, Grigsby used poor judgment in changing the already
>existing cultivar name
It may not have been poor judgement as we know it; Dave was in the stages
of the Alzheimer's wich ultimately claimed his life. he was not a
name-fabricator, and kep meticulous records of plants and their sources.
even tho one must put some kind of moniker on a plant to sell, in half for
full qutes, dave knew the rules.
Many either do not or seem so eager for a piece of their fifteen minutes of
fame, that they apply names like magnets to a refrigerator!
har har!
hermine
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index