This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Re: Lights & Tom
- To: "Square Foot Gardening List" sqft@listbot.com>
- Subject: Re: Re: Lights & Tom
- From: Bill OOWON@netscape.net>
- Date: 26 Mar 00 11:36:58 PST
Square Foot Gardening List - http://www.flinet.com/~gallus/sqft.html
Bill writes:
> *They [fluorescents] are 90% efficient where an incandescent is 25%
> about. You are at about 65%. Replace them
*Aside from the below, replace in a year may still be wise and is SOP.
Life can be from 2500-500 hours, under 'normal use.' Varies a lot, and on and
off is the hardest on them. Yet hours count too...
*So it's like a disk drive. Except on a portable computer, where battery is
the more important factor, don't put this 10-30 wats device to sleep in power
settings. Drives are cheap, finally, but loss of data and time to recover is
the important factor. Email me offList if you need help.
>According to http://www.state.sc.us/energy/efflight.htm, incandescents
are no more than 10% efficient, while fluorescents are "up to 5 times
more efficient", which presumably means 50% or less
*Yup...!
>Another web page (http://www.holophane.com/School/HL-862.htm)
explains that LPS lights deliver 100-180 lumens per watt; 180 lumens
per watt is ten times the efficacy of a standard 100-watt bulb.
>Yup...!
>It's hard to find good info on absolute efficiency of light bulbs;
these figures obviously all contradict one another. Still, it seems
doubtful that fluorescents are 90% efficient.
*Uhhh, yes and no.
>One of the points the various lighting-efficiency pages made is that
you might be better off with a high-intensity discharge lamp (such as a
mercury light) in a situation like this. HID lamps have some
disadvantages for normal use --- they take a few minutes to turn on,
they're not available in small wattages, and they have relatively poor
color rendition --- but those don't seem to figure here.
*Well, plants want a different color is all. bnest is one freq at one stage
of growth, and another later. A certain one if you can only afford one. 1000
wats does an 8x8 area. If you added low light plants at the periferey, you
could hit 10x10 or 56% more area. 10w/sq ft.
*BUt that's at 15 cents per hr, at say 10 hrs a day min., 30 da/mo.
That's $45 a month. Better have a NEED or high cash crop. (Hopefully,
legal.)
>> *Yeah... engineers are such jerks , huh. Always with blindres on.
>> Can only see straight ahead, and only with that right hat on and
>> matching coffee cup and pencil protector.
>Uh, yeah. Thanks. Now, where did I put my "pencil protector"?
*I just keep several on hand. Never know when you'lll need a backup.
Bill/ Zone 9.4973 +/- / 69% Sun / Baro 30.20 and steady, up 0.04 :>)
The specs say it's a nice day.... LOL
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to sqft-unsubscribe@listbot.com
______________________________________________________________________
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index