This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.
Re: Re: AB: Point Well Taken
iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: Re: Re: AB: Point Well Taken
  • From: R* P* <r*@embarqmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:38:41 -0400 (EDT)
Sharon: I am a bit nervous that I may not have the correct plant, yet it is extremely close. Can I put your photo on the encyclopedia because coming from it hybridizer it must be correct?. Feel free to add any comments about the cultivar that posterity or us might find interesting.
----- Original Message -----
From: smciris@aol.com
To: iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:24:12 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: AB:  Point Well Taken

 In a message dated 4/16/2010 11:26:25 AM Mountain Daylight Time, robertpries@embarqmail.com writes:

Sharon: I have Point Well Taken blooming eight now in my garden, It is a huge flower and quite striking. it will be donated to the ASI plant exchange this summer. I checked on the Iris encyclopedia for other pictures to verify the ID. I noted that the picture I took and another both show darker standards. Do you know if these fade or are less dark under different environmental conditions. Otherwise i wouls guess that they are all the same Iris. see photos at  http://wiki.irises.org/bin/view/Main/AbPointWellTaken

Here's a seedling photo, taken in 1993.  This was early in the morning in full shade, so it shows the colors but not the fully expanded form.  In arilbreds, I've noticed that the background color in the photo seems to affect color perception more than growing conditions. 
 
Sharon McAllister
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index