Re: RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- From: &* A* M* <n*@charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:34:07 -0400
Looking at Anna's photo and blowing it up to nearly
full screen, I believe I do see a narrow edge of tan on the fall matching the
color of the standards. Also, at the larger image size a brownish overlay
on the fall is not visible. The standards appear to merge into a blend of yellow
and violet at their upper ends. 'Desert Canyon' does not have this blended
look.
The fall violet pigment appears rather
stronger than that of 'Desert Canyon,' and the hafts appear to have both a
substantially different shape and a different pattern. 'Desert Canyon'
looks more gold on a colored ground whereas Anna's unknown has brown
markings on a near-white ground. I believe the differences are more than
can be accounted for by difference in photographic equipment type, film and
illumination, let alone possible differences in growing conditions and
fertility.
It is almost impossible to identify an unknown with
certainty unless you have the unknown growing side by side with
the possible known cv under identical care and conditions. Equally, it is
nearly as impossible to say an unknown is not a certain variety
if the two show strong similarities unless they too are grown side by
side.
In any event, Anna, I have enjoyed seeing your
photos. You have some lovely irises whatever their names may
be.
Neil Mogensen z 7 western NC
mountains
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- From: &* S* &*
- Re: RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- References:
- RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- From: &* A* M* &*
- RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- Prev by Date: RE: Bleach water
- Next by Date: Cult:Spring has sprung
- Previous by thread: RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]
- Next by thread: Re: RE: 'Desert Canyon' [was: ID on this one too?]