This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re: [SPAM] IB-ONLY FOOLIN'

Not sure I can explain it any better but think of it this way the first left ( and the last ) enclose the entire pollen parent half of the equation.  the second ( and the first ) enclose a sub equation.  In that manner there are two lefts(( and two rights)), the two rights are just separated.  It works the same way when writing formulas in excel <Grin>

 

Dana


 
Dana Brown



----- Original Message ----
From: Linda Smith <irisgrower@cableone.net>
To: iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:22:12 PM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Re: [SPAM] [iris-photos] IB-ONLY FOOLIN'

 Yes, I'm understanding better.  Still don't understand why the 2 (( infront of Embassadora w no )) anywhere.  Seems like the (( should have an )) somewhere??? ????
 
Linda
-------Original Message----- --
 
From: j*@mts.net
Date: 02/23/07 10:20:39
To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Re: [SPAM] [iris-photos] IB-ONLY FOOLIN'
 

Hi Linda,

In my very basic understanding, I've used ONLY FOOLIN' as an example.

(Manchu Coffee x Capricornia) X ((Embassadora x Evening Echo) x Touch of Bronze).

To me, this means that for Only Foolin', its parentage is a seedling resulting from a cross between Manchu Coffee and Capricornia which has then been crossed with a seedling that resulted from a cross between Embassadora by Evening Echo and Touch of Bronze.

Does this make any sense??? Do I understand correctly???

Thanks,

BJ in SW MB (waiting for a blizzard to hit.... 1st one of the winter so far)

 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index