The middle right one is
more lavender. Nearly identical to the one from Superstition. I
see little or no difference in the three blue ones.
<<the others on your
monitor. Is it more lavender than others>>
Do cataracts effect one's perception of color?
Betty W.
-----Original
Message-----
From: d7432da <
donald@eastland.net>
To:
iris-photos@
yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 6:11
pm
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: photo backgrounds, etc
That's why I phrased the question referencing the monitor. Here is a
representation of 6 photos of the same bloom. On my monitor, three appear true
blue and one more tilting mostly blue. There are two showing that are more
lavender than blue. The one Mike selected and the one from Superstition.
Differences in monitors aside, the way this is presented is as one photo of
all six. The differences in the way the blooms appear should be apparent on
any monitor because they have been placed into a single photo via Mike's
method of putting six on one page and then posting that page as a single
photo. How does the one he selected compare to the others on your monitor. Is
it more lavender than others, more blue, or how does it fit?
Donald
Eaves
donald@eastland.netTexas Zone
7b, USA
--- In
iris-photos@yahoogroups.com,
Autmirislvr@
... wrote:
>
> My understanding has been that all
monitors are different. How can any of us know what someone else is seeing on
their monitor? Is the middle right one really the same on both monitors? How
could you tell?
>
> <<Which one is closest to what you see
per viewing on your monitor?>>
>
>
> Betty W.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Mike Greenfield
<mgreenfield@...>
> To: iris-photos <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
>
Sent: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 1:19 pm
> Subject: [iris-photos] Re: photo
backgrounds, etc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How small did you make the individual pics to put on one
page??
> jim in AZ
>
>
>
> I opened a new
blank image in Paint Shop Pro 12" X 12". Each iris photo was resized to 8".
Then pasted as a new layer in the blank image. Then stretched to fit. Same can
be done in Adobe Elements.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by
"photocopying".
> Donald Eaves.
>
> Sorry I meant to
say photoshoping = adjusting photo with software. Spell check changed it and I
didn't catch it.
>
> The whole discussion, though, does raise an
interesting point in a similar area. What about the 'official' R&I
descriptions? How much leeway are they given? Since blooms are not static,
where is the point at which describing it is pinpointed? The 2nd day?
Somewhere in the middle of opening and dying? Obviously it's neither practical
or possible to provide the progression of the life of the bloom, so how do
folks decide?
> Donald Eaves.
>
> Good question! First
write discripions of 5 iris you grow. This gives you an idea of the problem.
Then give us a fix. The description is up to the hybredizer. The registrar
does not change it. It is just a basic thing. If it fits it grow one from a
reputable grower.
>
> That's interesting! Which one is closest to
what you see per viewing on your monitor?
> Donald Eaves.
>
> The middle one on the right.
>
>
> Mike
Greenfield
> Zone 5b
> SW Ohio
> http://www.home.roadrunner.com/~irisinohio/
>
