Re: Sandy Mohr
- Subject: [iris-photos] Re: Sandy Mohr
- From: "donald" d*@eastland.net
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:02:22 -0000
> Last year I received Sandy Mohr as an extra with an order. It did
not bloom this year and I have been unable to find a registration
for it.
>
> Can anyone provide a description, photo and/or parentage?
I received this too, but unfortunately it just survived a bout with
rot only to have all the increase (very late) disappear to
grasshoppers. The rhizome is still firm, but I'm doubtful it will
recover now.
Here's a bit of info. Not registered. Circa 1957 by Loomis - a
WILLIAM MOHR derivative. Described as a big, unusual flower in
shades of yellow and tan. May be an OB- but was disenrolled as an
arilbred because the content could not be determined. Was marketed
in '57 despited not being registered. I don't have a height noted.
I hope your rhizome thrives. This is one I'd like a chance at
growing again.
Donald Eaves
donald@eastland.net
Texas Zone 8, USA
>
> Betsy Higgins
> Hendersonville, NC
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Natural Vitamins for Good Prostate & Male Health. $28.97
http://www.challengerone.com/t/l.asp?cid=2865&lp=prosta2.html
http://us.click.yahoo.com/qJIe0D/89VGAA/ySSFAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[PHOTO] Re: Alice Goodman, E Roderick 1988. Short for me.