{Disarmed} Re: Re: BOLD LOOK vs EARLY GIRL (was sugar coated)
- Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [iris-photos] Re: BOLD LOOK vs EARLY GIRL (was sugar coated)
- From: Jan Lauritzen j*@yahoo.com
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, Early Girl is listed as EM and Bold Look as L. I was just commenting on the fact that many look a lot like others and Early Girl was not a misnamed Bold Look.
Jan in Chatsworth
Linda Mann <lmann@lock-net.com> wrote:
Linda Mann <lmann@lock-net.com> wrote:
Photo of blooms may be very similar, but there are probably other
differences - isn't BOLD LOOK a late bloomer?
--
Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis >
American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org >
talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/ >iris-talk/
photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/ >iris-photos/
online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Silk plant | Plant maintenance | Plant safety |
Plant relocation | Plant grow light | Exchange |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "iris-photos" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
iris-photos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- References:
- Re: BOLD LOOK vs EARLY GIRL (was sugar coated)
- From: L* M*
- From: L* M*
- Re: BOLD LOOK vs EARLY GIRL (was sugar coated)
- Prev by Date: {Disarmed} TB: Sugar Coated
- Next by Date: {Disarmed} Re: Re: Autumn Reisling, clumps
- Previous by thread: Re: BOLD LOOK vs EARLY GIRL (was sugar coated)
- Next by thread: Re: Autumn Reisling, clumps