Re: Re: REF: checklist

I'd be pleased If they could also correct the spelling of my name in my first intro:
 
EITJE   
Lo?c Tasquier
2007 Introduction
 
With the checklist system, Loïc has become Lo?c
If it can't come up with  ï , it could at least put  i , not ?
 
if I can't be called Loïc any more, (and i can't think of any reason why  )..., I'd rather be called Loic than Lo?c  ...
 
Sincerely,
Loïc
 
Ps: just have a look how this message turns out when sent on iris-talk... I'm sure it will become unreadable... must be the same kind of machine that is used for the checklist.
if only  my name were the only one, but many names are butchered by this inadapted technology.
 
 

----- Original Message -----
From: l*@lock-net.com
To: i*@hort.net ; iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 5:10 AM
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: REF: checklist

Sounds like access to the online checklist is working, but yes, 'they'
are working on the checklist. Mike Lowe (registrar), Keith Keppel and
Phil Edinger are currently cleaning up inconsistencies and typos in
cultivar names (main entries vs pedigree spellings).

--
Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index