hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: saturaton in iris photos
  • Subject: Re: saturaton in iris photos
  • From: irischapman@aim.com
  • Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:37:35 -0500


In terms of checking colour of a flower against it's photo  on screen, several factors are at play. your camera, and your screen for example. (or heaven's forbid, your colour perception)

The danger of correcting a photo  to the actual flower is fraught with danger.  Most monitors have not been colour corrected, so it will not display the same on another monitor. While LED monitors are less expensive to operate (power consumption) they don't seem to be as accurate ascathode ray monitors. 

I have two moniters set up on my computer. The LED Benq is one of the better LED monitors for colour, but not even a close match to my 21" Triniton  cathode ray monitor, which has superb colour. It is the one I use to adjust colour on pictures, to try to match original colour.  This monitor has also been calibrated using photoshop , so that helps give it  more accurate colour.

A test of your monitor is to print out pure printer ink colours from your colour printer and hold up to your monitor with a display of these colours. The printer ink is Cyan (a blue-green). Magenta and yellow. Combined with black to give what is called a CYMK  format, which is what is usually used in printing process, in computer printers and in comercial printers (with standard printing)

So if you colour correct a digital photo on an uncalibrated or inaccurate monitor, colour will not be correct on someone else's monitor, and perhaps a slightly off photo is made worse.

Chuck Chapman

-----Original Message-----
From: Lowell Baumunk <LBaumunk@iriscolorado.com>
To: Iris Photos <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 10:26 am
Subject: [iris-photos] saturaton in iris photos

It's not unusual that photos of irises will have unrealistic colors.  With digital photo editing programs, we have an easy chance to correct colors to what we perceive with the eye.  Hybridizers and nurseries should be most careful not to use photos with flowers colors that are too vivid in color, resulting in disappointed or angry customers when the plant blooms in their garden. 
The appearance of the foliage in a photo can give a clue as to whether the level of color saturation is correct.  If the leaves seem to have a realistic color, chances are that the flower does too.  If the foliage is a neon shade of green, it may be that the colors in the flowers are correspondingly too vivid.
The first picture shows what I think are correct colors.  The second shows it over-saturated.  The third shows that a person who knows Photoshop can probably fool us by making the flower overly vivid while leaving the foliage natural-looking.
It must be said that there are all kinds of variables affecting the color we perceive in a photo, and that what I have written here is only a general guideline.
Lowell Baumunk

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement