[PHOTO] CULT: Labels
- Subject: [PHOTO] [iris-photos] CULT: Labels
- From: a*@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 08:57:22 EDT
This is a picture of the labeling method I use. I adopted the process from
Dallas Patterson' posting one year ago. See digest 1129, 6 July 2000.
Ninety-nine per cent of the labels have held up very well. I have noticed on
some labels dust creeping behind the top of the label. On the reverse of the
marker I have a number which corresponds to my computer listings of the
flower, bush or variety etc. It maybe a little large at 29K, but I want to
show flower and label.
Al Bullock
zone 7
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
![]() |
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CULT: Labels
- From: M* L*
- From: M* L*
- Re: CULT: Labels
- From: T* G*
- From: T* G*
- Re: CULT: Labels
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Aardvark Anticz small
- Next by Date:
[PHOTO] unknown iris
- Prev by thread:
[PHOTO] unknown iris
- Next by thread: Re: CULT: Labels