[PHOTO] CULT: Labels | Wed, 30 May 2001 07:59:05" />
hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

[PHOTO] CULT: Labels

  • Subject: [PHOTO] [iris-photos] CULT: Labels
  • From: alhbee@aol.com
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 08:57:22 EDT

This is a picture of the labeling method I use. I adopted the process from
Dallas Patterson' posting one year ago. See digest 1129, 6 July 2000.
Ninety-nine per cent of the labels have held up very well. I have noticed on
some labels dust creeping behind the top of the label. On the reverse of the
marker I have a number which corresponds to my computer listings of the
flower, bush or variety etc. It maybe a little large at 29K, but I want to
show flower and label.

Al Bullock
zone 7

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

JPEG image

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index