Re: CULT: Labels

---

• Subject: Re: [iris-photos] CULT: Labels
• From: T* G*
• Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:58:18 +0000

Al, I just tried searching the archives using "Dallas
Patterson", "digest 1129" and "6 July 2000" and only get
this post of yours.  How did you get to that digest?  I'd
like to see that article.

Thanks, Tom

alhbee@aol.com wrote:
> 
> This is a picture of the labeling method I use. I adopted
> the process from
> Dallas Patterson' posting one year ago. See digest 1129, 6
> July 2000.
> Ninety-nine per cent of the labels have held up very well.
> I have noticed on
> some labels dust creeping behind the top of the label. On
> the reverse of the
> marker I have a number which corresponds to my computer
> listings of the
> flower, bush or variety etc. It maybe a little large at
> 29K, but I want to
> show flower and label.
> 
> Al Bullock
> zone 7
>                    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service.
> 
>  [Image]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CULT: Labels
    • From: "s*"
  • Re: CULT: Labels
    • From: "C* L* C*"

• References:
  • [PHOTO] CULT: Labels
    • From: a*

• Prev by Date: [PHOTO] unknown iris
• Next by Date: Re: CULT: Labels
• Prev by thread: [PHOTO] CULT: Labels
• Next by thread: Re: CULT: Labels