[PHOTO] Batik imposters | Sat, 3 May 2003 08:57:07" />
hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

[PHOTO] Batik imposters

  • Subject: [PHOTO] [iris-photos] Batik imposters
  • From: "Harold Peters" harold@directcon.net
  • Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 06:57:02 -0700
  • Importance: Normal

The following two flowers are from a commercial garden customer of mine. They were supposed to be Batik but are quite different in both flower and clump characteristics. The customer doesn't know the source but it could have been from me. Even if I was the source, I have no way to tracing back to the original source. The customer likes the blooms and is going to grow them another year to see what they do on second bloom. Anyone recognize a possibility of these being registered or have similar extreme variation of the Batik pattern? Any assistance would be appreciated.
Harold Peters
Beautiful View Iris Garden
2048 Hickok Road
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
harold@directcon.net  www.beautiful-view-iris.com

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

JPEG image

JPEG image

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index