RE: HYB: R 16-9(photo included)

---

• Subject: RE: [iris-photos] HYB: R 16-9(photo included)
• From: a*@cs.com
• Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:03:56 -0400

"Harold Peters" <harold@directcon.net> wrote:

>Linda and Neil
>
>Within the limits of my memory, I have been to an AIS judges' training that
>clarified the moral aspect of "haft marks". They are good if they contribute
>to the beauty of the bloom. I like the R 16-9 haft marks and would acquire
>it the second or third year after introduction. I have seen ugly 1950 haft
>marks on 2000+ introductions. I have a rather low opinion of the hybridizer
>as I consider those haft marks as fatal for introduction.
>
>Harold Peters

Amazing how tastes have changed down thru the years!  But I must say that I 
like this one, too.

Sharon McAllister


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EA3HyD/3MnJAA/79vVAA/2gGylB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-photos/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    iris-photos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

• Prev by Date: Re: HYB: R 16-9(photo included)
• Next by Date: HYB: seedling 03 34 D Golden Immortal x Rio
• Previous by thread: RE: N86-1: Butterfly Wings OB-  X  Ben David OGB
• Next by thread: RE: Re: HYB: R 16-9(photo included)