iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Re: TB: more sdlgs
- From: c* s* <c*@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Actually Fred Kerr gave me that tip at a regional. Several of Ghio's Iris have a similar trait. The cross I tried first was Designer Label x Expose. I got the pattern in several seedlings, but only fair form (see attached). I would like to see the violet lines on a true pink from the 'blue' side... Chad From: d7432da <donald@eastland. To: iris-photos@ Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 1:29:17 PM Subject: [iris-photos] Re: TB: more sdlgs Thanks Chad, Have you only tried with pink? I liked the pattern on the top and middle photos, but it's not as distinctive as seen on Puccini. I just didn't the combo of colors on the 2nd photo. Either color is fine, but not together. But I didn't expect any visual _expression_ of the pattern and I think both those results derive from the pattern so I think you are probably correct about it's being at least partially dominant. Donald ------------ Statements made on and attachments (including but not limited to photographs of irises or people) sent to this list are the sole responsibility of the individual participants and are not endorsed by, or attributable to, or under the control of the moderator of this list. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups. <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups. (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: iris-photos- iris-photos- <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: iris-photos- <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs. |
- Follow-Ups:
- Newest seedlings
- From: V* &*
- Re: Re: TB: more sdlgs
- From: "El Hutchison" <eleanore@mts.net>
- Re: Re: TB: more sdlgs
- From: V* &*
- Re: TB: more sdlgs
- From: "d7432da" <donald@eastland.net>
- Newest seedlings
- References:
- Re: TB: more sdlgs
- From: "d7432da" <donald@eastland.net>
- Re: TB: more sdlgs
- Prev by Date: Re: ADMIN: Photo Sizes
- Next by Date: Re: TB: more sdlgs
- Previous by thread: Re: TB: more sdlgs
- Next by thread: Re: TB: more sdlgs