hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: intro help
  • Subject: Re: Re: intro help
  • From: Dana Brown <ddbro@sbcglobal.net>
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT)


Hey John,
I understand, but wouldn't you be happier with 2 or even 3 onco blooms?  I mean, isn't that one of the things we are trying to accomplish when we create arilbreds?  We want aril flowers with more buds and easier growth habits?
That said, I didn't say I wouldn't buy it or that I didn't like it.  I was just commiserating with Mike for having such a problem, the lucky dog. 
Malevil Iris Gardens & Kennels
 I own a dog and I vote!!

From: johnhb67114 <johnb002@cox.net>
To: iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, May 18, 2010 7:28:43 PM
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: intro help


Hi Mike. INTRODUCE IT!!!! and put me first on the list
for one. Ahh Dana, I have to strongly disagree with you.
High bud count really don't mean Jack Doodly s--t to me.
Of coarse you know that, one Onco bloom is good enough
for the whole year :<)

John B

--- In iris-photos@yahoogroups.com, Dana Brown <ddbro@...> wrote:
> Mike,
> ààà Ah...the dilemma.à It is a beautiful seedling, one I would beàproud to grow.à So, commercially yes, it should be introduced.à However, the bud thing bothers me as well.à The reason 7 buds are required is so that a clump will stay in bloom for 2 weeks.à The number one criticism that I hear about ouràfavorite flower is that they bloom for such a short time.à If we start/continue the practise of introducing, and propogating iris that only have 5, or fewer, buds and will not stay in bloom for two weeks then we are shooting ourselves in the foot.à
> ààà I grow and love many iris that are beautiful in flower and form and will never receive a vote on a ballot because they do not perform up to specifications.à There is nothing wrong with that.à Many iris are commercially successful without being award worthy and there is nothing wrong with that either.
> ààà Now that I have alienated most of this list, LOL, I will say that I am glad it isn't my decision to make!!à Tough choice.
> Dana
> Dana Brown
> ddbro@...
> Malevil Iris Gardens & Kennels
> www.malevil-iris.com
> àI own a dog and I vote!!
> ________________________________
> From: Michael Sutton <orders@...>
> To: iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, May 18, 2010 9:14:26 AM
> Subject: [iris-photos] intro help
> à
> need feedback please.....à very bright well formed seedling.... sometimes only 5 buds, will vary from 5 to 7 averaging 6.à From a commercial standpoint this probably should be introduced, but the bud issue kind of bothers me.à it is also a great parent.... should it be introduced?à any help would be greatly appreciated, btw the band on the falls is very, very red in the garden.
> Mike Sutton

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement