COMP: Poll (was ADMIN)

In a message dated 11/25/2002 8:07:05 AM Central Standard Time, 
randysiris@juno.com writes:

<< I see nothing wrong with iris-photos except the occasional
 virus. >>

In addition to the chance of a virus, I don't want to load up my memory with 
pictures I'll never look at again.  (In most cases) I view the photos at the 
Mallorn archives.  It's just easier for me and, if it made it to the 
archives, I can always look it up again. When Yahoo bounces the photos and 
messages, as they did a few days ago, it creates a problem.  Either they go 
missing forever, or someone has to go to Yahoo and retrieve them.  This only 
works if someone knows they've gone missing AND has time and ability to do 
the retrieval.  

If the pictures & messages go straight to Mallorn, wouldn't this avoid all 
the 'bouncing' around?? 

A couple of years ago I was on the dahlia list & iris photos.  I tried to 
download pictures to floppies and couldn't believe how fast one filled up.  

Just my opinion but my vote is for Mallorn.  

Betty Wilkerson Zone 6 SouthCentral Kentucky

American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
iris-talk/Mallorn archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
iris-photos/Mallorn archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index