HYB:1812-1RE:More
- Subject: [iris-photos] HYB:1812-1RE:More
- From: &* A* M* <n*@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:44:16 -0400
Betty, I don't know just how one would charaterize
this pattern on 1812-1RE. It looks a lot like very dilute Umbrata I
think. I'm not familiar with the pod parent, and you said the pollen parent
was a plicata.
Some plicatas have very heavy haft coloring--I've
wondered what that was in relation to other patterns in TB's. It is
possible that is the result when Umbrata and plicata get expressed at the same
time. I've never seen an iris with plicata standards and Umbrata falls, so
the combination must do something other than make plicata/self
bicolors.
I had a number of seedlings along the line of
1812-1RE from HAPPENSTANCE and POWER WOMAN that had a light wash of
anthocyanin on the upper falls over rich golden yellow flowers--and one in
pink with the same wash, only over pink it looks more violet than over the
yellow. Like in this seedling the wash extended down about half way on the
falls. I neither photographed or saved any of this type. I've saved
a few that haven't yet bloomed (poor soil to blame) so may get another
chance.
I did keep a "Joyce Terry" type and a very wide
light orchid non-t bearded self--it had a white beard with a touch of
blue. The other seedlings weren't very attractive colors and had very
noisy hafts. The combination was not the most happy one I've ever
seen.
LOTUS LAND with the sister seedling to POWER WOMAN
had all sorts of good things, with none of them showing this sort of Umbrata
wash half way down the fall. Several were bitones with full fall color,
but none half the fall. I have no idea why the difference.
Neil Mogensen z 7 western NC
mountains.
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Prev by Date: Re: HYB:1812-1RE:More
- Next by Date: Re: HYB:1812-1RE:More
- Previous by thread: HYB:1812-1RE:More
- Next by thread: Seedling