Re: Re: 'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: 'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:17:43 -0600
- References: 43EE9AA7.1D454D05.4D7C6017@netscape.net
- Seal-send-time: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:17:43 -0600
|
Chuck wrote:
"On Tid-Bit the spathes do look pallida but the
branching is low and wide, not the typical pallida look." From what I remember, my three cultivars of
cengialtii also have lower and wider branching than "typical" I. pallida, but I
will need to check photos or perhaps wait till the flower to verify this.
They are much smaller and more delicate, with thinner stems. The foliage
looks different too, but again I need to let them grow a bit more before I can
really quantify the difference. As I recall cengialtii is less "stiff"
looking, and more "grass-like" with a richer green (but varies from clone to
clone) coloring. I seem to recall that at least 'Mostar' has some raised
ridges on the leaf, somewhat as in I. variegata and I. aphylla, but not so
pronounced, and this is never noticeable on more typical I.
pallida.
Dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- Next by Date: Re: Re: I. pallida cengialtii?
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- Next by thread: Re: 'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?