It's too bad the root picture doesn't show the rhizome. It
looks like the rhizome has very short dense branching like
a Siberian (not to imply the flower looks Siberian);
however other things, like recent branching, can cause
fans to be crowded together like that.
Ken Walker
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:25:26 -0400
"Chuck Chapman irischapman@aim.com [iris-species]"
<iris-species@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> Check root picture. Not spuria.
>
> Chuck Chapman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodney Barton rbartontx@yahoo.com [iris-species]
> <iris-species@yahoogroups.com>
> To: iris-species <iris-species@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 12:09 pm
> Subject: Re: [iris-species] Iris brevicaulis imposter
>
> Â
> Looks like a spuria!
>
>
> R
>
>
>
> From: "Dennis Kramb dkramb@badbear.com
>[iris-species]"
> <iris-species@yahoogroups.com>
> To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:44 AM
> Subject: [iris-species] Iris brevicaulis imposter
>
>
> Â
> I may have asked this question before, but I find myself
>staring at
> these pictures again and wondering what it
> is...https://www.prairiemoon.com/plants/bare-root/wildflowers-forbs/iris-
> brevicaulis-short-stemmed-iris.html
> It's being sold as Iris brevicaulis, but I wonder if
>it's I.
> missouriensis or I. virginica or something else? It's
>surely not I.
> brevicaulis.
> Dennis in Cincinnati
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>