Re: Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)
- To: <i*@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)
- From: &* F* <m*@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:18:40 -0700
- References: <c0aq2p+mnvk@eGroups.com>
- Seal-send-time: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:18:40 -0700
|
Watch out, this is long.
I can make an attempt to add a little more clarity to this question.
There has been much good discussion and information, but maybe it will help to
break it down some. I'm going to concentrate on bearded Iris, because to
be honest, I don't understand Beardless species nearly as well. However, I
will make a few comments related to them. Some of this may be really
basic, and most of you know it, but some might help sort out some
confusion.
First, with the Bearded Iris (excluding for the moment Arils, Regalias,
& Psamiris, which are also Bearded Iris and closely related to what most
consider to be the "true" Bearded Iris) there are two basic numbers of
chromosomes. One is 8 and one is 12. Some species (all are dwarf I
believe) have a basic set of 8 chromosomes. Most species have a basic set
of 12. This is one set only; this is the haploid number, and you might
consider it as the lowest number you can get in those species, the basic
building block. This is the number that is passed on to an ovule or pollen
grain (gametes) when it comes from a diploid plant (read on).
This might be summed up as follows:
1n = 8
1n = 12
Except when they are undergoing meiosis, there is always present in all
cells at least two pairs of these basic "building blocks". Plants with two
are called diploid. Some have double, triple, or even quaduple the basic
diploid number, and these are tetraploid, hexaploid, and octaploid
respectively. Wild species of bearded Iris come in diploid and in
tetraploid.
2n = 16 = diploid
4n = 32 = tetraploid (this is usually written as 2n = 32, which is
confusing, but is meant to imply the full paired compliment of
chromosomes).
2n = 24 = diploid
4n = 48 = tetraploid (same comment as above).
Meiosis splits these numbers in half, so half of the chromosomes go to each
of the ovules or pollen. Tetraploid plants actually produce diploid pollen
and ovules.
If you mix diploid pollen with haploid ovules (or visa versa) you will get
a triploid plant with three sets of chromosomes.
8 + 16 = 24
12 = 24 = 38
It has to be emphisized that the triploid with a base number of 8 (x 3) is
not the same thing as the diploid with a base number of 12 (x 2). So, the
same chromosome number can actually be arrived at in different ways and it can
mean different things in different plants.
If somebody crosses a specimen of I. attica with I. pumila, it should
produce triploids with a number of 3n = 24. These should be sterile.
However, if treated the I. attica is treated with chemicals (or just through
chance as in the good ol' days) to interfere with meiosis and produce
unreduced (diploid) gametes with 16 chromosomes, then cross those with I.
pumila, the result should be fertile I. pumila x I. attica tetraploid hybrids
with 32 chromosomes. These could be used to introduce I. attica genetics
into 32 chromosome dwarf lines, or used in all the other ways that I. pumila has
been used.
Now back to the sets of 8 and 12. They are related, a gamete with 8
comes in contact with a gamete with 12, many of the chromosomes will try to
pair up; however, things aren't quite even and equally matched, so there are
usually some things that go wrong, such as extras that don't pair up at all, and
some that try to pair with more than one other. These two groups of
species are closely related and they will hybridize; however, the offspring that
receive one set of 8 from one parent and one set of 12 from another are
generally sterile, because when they undergo meiosis to produce pollen and
ovules, the chromosomes don't behave properly and the reproductive cells
generally don't mature properly or at all.
Now to the miracle of chromosome number doubling. When you take a
tetraploid 32 and cross it with a tetraploid 48, you get two sets of 8 and
two sets of 12. Now they all have somebody to pair up with, and now it
works. You get nice fertile 40 chromosome "amphidiploids". Generally
these hybrids are fertile. In this way it should be possible to get I.
attica genetics (heat and drought tolerance, etc.) into the blood lines of
dwarfs and intermediates. It actually seems likely to me that I. pumila or
unreduced I. attica are responsible for the 40 chromomes wild species (I.
lutescens and it's close relatives).
"Amphidiploid" might be confusing, since on the surface if might seem that
these should be called tetraploids, since they have four full sets of
chromosomes. However, now they behave as if they have only two haploid
sets of 20. This twenty is derived from 8 + 12, but now it behaves as if
it is one unit or one new basic "building block". Often, if you cross
these with the parents with either 8 or 12, things will get messed up again;
there will likely be pairing mistakes, because some of the 8 are very similar to
some of the 12, and the chromosomes from the 8 or 12 chromosome parent have
trouble pairing up just as mentioned above. These back crosses are often
of reduced fertility or sterile, but sometimes they work. You can get the
first generation with 28 or 32 chromosomes, but a second generation crossed
with anything is very difficult to get. Again notice you have 32
chromosomes, but here it is 12 + 8 + 12 instead of 4 x 8. Just having the
count doesn't always count (pun intended).
This can go on and on and on.
Again back to the 8 and 12. It is difficult to know which came
first. Perhaps long ago the basic number was 4 (which would have made
diploid plants with 8 chromosomes), and some decendents became diploid with 2n =
8 and others hexaploid with 2n = 24. After long enough periods of
isolation, enough changes could occur to make it so that the basic sets of 4 in
each didn't quite match up any more. However, 4 is a very low number of
chromosomes for any plant, and it is very unlikely that this is the case.
It is more likely that either 8 or 12 is the primitive number. If 8 was
the primitive number accidents might have occurred that split one chromosome
into two, or extra chromosomes might have accidently gotten passed along in
unequal pairing accidents in meiosis. These extras are called
"supernumary" chromosomes. If these gradually get carried along from one
generation to the next until all offspring have extras, it can end up that one
extra eventually becomes a pair, two become two pairs, and so on until you have
a base number of 12 and a diploid number of 24 (four extra pairs). It can
also happen the other way. Sometimes through similar accidents, a
chromosome is lost. Usually this would be fatal, but apparently not
always. The number can gradually be reduced. More likely is that two
chromosomes fuse and become one. Sometimes you see Y-shaped chromosomes
instead of the usual linear chromosome, and fusion of two or parts of two
chromosomes is often likely the reason for this. Thus you can get a
reduction in number, even if it seems a bit illogical at first look.
This means you can have all sorts of odd numbers and combinations.
Generally the rule of thumb is that if a plant has an even number of sets of
chromosomes, and if all the chromosomes occur as matched pairs, then the plant
will be fertile. It will produce fertile offspring with plants of the same
chromosome makeup.
Now is a good time to mention some of the other Bearded Iris (Regalias and
Arils). These have either 10 or 11 as the basic "haploid" number.
They have diploid numbers of 20 or 22. Apparently the 11 is derived from
the 10, with one (duplicated) extra pair. When you cross a 20 (haploid is
10) with a 22 (haploid is 11) you get a 2n = 21 made from 10 + 11. These
are normally totally fertile, and the extra one chromosome isn't too
important. These have offspring that are either 2n = 20 or 2n = 21.
Eventually through the generations of hybrid offspring, that extra chromosome
gets lost. This is all nice, but things aren't quite as easy with the
"true" Bearded Iris discussed above. You end up with that same old problem
of mismatched pairs. The 10 or 11 aren't quite the same as the 8 or 12,
and they don't pair up quite right when hybridized. So, what's the
solution. Use tetraploids. Again either natural tetraploids or
artificially induced ones can be used. Then you get
those mismatched tetraploids or "amphidiploids" again, and again
they're perfectly fertile. They come out as:
8 + 8 + 10 + 10 = 36
8 + 8 + 10 + 11 = 37
8 + 8 + 11 + 11 = 38
12 + 12 + 10 + 10 = 44 (not the same as the 44 of I. x germanica and I. x
albicans)
and so on
However, now if you try that fertile amphidiploid 2n = 40 I. lutescens or
SDB with one of the tetraploid Aril/Regalia types, you'll have problems.
It all gets out of whack again. You can't take the basically haploid 20 of
one these and match it to the diploid 20 of the Aril/Regalia tetraploids.
[8 + 12] + 10 + 10 = 40 Now you have for all practical purposes have
three basically different sets trying to match up. The two sets of 20
behave properly in their respective plants, but they don't match properly and
won't pair up properly.
And so it goes. It can all be very interesting, and very
confusing. Sort of like number puzzles. Which combinations will
work, and which won't? The rules are actually pretty simple, but if you
don't have enough information, it is difficult to understand what is
happening. Generally any first generation cross will produce plants, but
some of those first generation plants may be sterile because things just aren't
sorting out correctly when they try to produce ovules and pollen.
By the way, the Psamiris fit in here similarly, but I haven't learned much
about them yet myself.
Now I'll comment briefly about the Beardless Iris. The story is
pretty much the same; however, it seems that the changes in the actual
chromosomes are often not enough to eliminate fertility in mismatched
numbers. It is sort of like the 10 and 11 of the Aril and Regalia
types. The extra one in the 11 is not important. It is a supernumary
chromosome, and it doesn't affect the pairing in negative ways. It is less
like the case of the 8 and 12 where the differences have become so great that
they just won't pair up properly. The extra four aren't just added to the
same basic 8, but rather there are great differences in all or most of the
chromosomes to the point that things just won't sort out properly.
Not all Beardless Iris can be crossed with all others to produce fertile
offspring, and some probably cannot be crossed at all. Generally the more
related, the more likely the offspring will be fertile.
I might mention that apparently the Crested Iris (or at least a number of
them) are closely related to the Bearded Iris also, at least to the degree that
they can be hybridized. Again, the secret to making these fertile would be
to produce amphidiploids or amphipolyploids. It actually might be quite
possible to mix and match traits of Crested and Bearded Iris. Can you
think of a better way to get cold and/or damp tolerance into an Aril Iris?
And, can you imagine the bizzar flowers that might be possible? Whole new
classes could be invented.
Well, now I'm dreaming.
Hope this helps more than confuses.
Dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)
- Previous by thread: Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)
- Next by thread: Re: Iris attica (was more questions from the newbie)