Re: setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- From: D* K* <d*@badbear.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:24:18 -0500
- References: <c1j088+a9hh@eGroups.com>
Marty Schafer & Janet Sacks have several years of experience under their belt growing Iris tridentata in Zone 6 climate in Massachusetts. I, also, have several years experience growing Iris tridentata in Zone 6 in Ohio.
My understanding is that Iris tridentata occurs naturally in Zones 7b through 8b. I live in 6a, almost 5b, in Ohio.
Dennis in Cincinnati
At 05:00 PM 2/25/2004 -0800, you wrote:
On rereading your message I realized there was aloy left unanswered. Hookeri appears to be more of a coastal species than setosa. Northeastern Atlantic coast. It seems to be very tolerate of salt spray. But than again setosa in the Alaskan Aletian Islands seems to be tolerant also. There does not seem to be a gradient but distinct forms, Setosa Interior verses Alaskan coastal populations, Each Island in the Aleutians has somewhat distinct variations with differebt shaped/sized standards. I know of no one that has compared Russian/Siberian plants to American but it would be espected that there would be some differences. Tridentata seems to occur is brackish caostal backwaters in the South. There is no reason to assume that it would not be hardy further North but No one has this data. It seems to me there is much more that we don't know than what we know. As far as i know no one has crossed or tried to cross tridentata with setosa. given their chromosome numbers one would expect some of the offspring to be sterile.
tesilvers <tesilvers@yahoo.com> wrote:
- setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- Could someone shed some light on the current taxonomic view of these
- irises? For instance, I seem to remember something about I.
- tridentata once being considered a geographically isolated population
- of setosa? And that the northeastern North American population of
- setosa, used to be called I.setosa var. canadensis, but is now maybe
- considered separate enough to be called I. hookeri. Does the
- population of setosa form a continuum, (from Asia through western
- North America to eastern North America) which grades from one type
- into another? Or are there discrete blocks of the types? And what are
- the distinguishing features of the types? For example, how would you
- tell a tridentata from a hookeri from a setosa var arctica?
- I'm mostly wondering how varied the setosa clan is and how
- interfertile these various members are? And are they all 2n=38?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- Next by Date: Re: setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- Previous by thread: Re: setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica
- Next by thread: Re: setosa, hookeri, tridentata, var. canandensis and var. arctica