Re: General garden catalogs
- To: <i*@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] General garden catalogs
- From: &* F* <m*@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:35:25 -0700
- References: <EC047828-68BA-11D8-ACD9-000A959B03FA@kc.rr.com> <149990303.20040227114621@delfi.lt>
- Seal-send-time: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:35:25 -0700
|
I suspect if you go back and look at old posts, you'll find that there has
been comment on this "wrong photo" subject on almost a yearly basis. Too
bad it never gets fixed.
This stock "photo" thing has been going on since the beginning of colored
catalogs. If you go back the the beginning, you find the same thing.
Sometimes it was a purposeful attempt to deceive, and sometimes it was I think
simply an honest attempt to find something similar to show. If you go back
to the catalogs in the 40's, 50's, and 60's you also see the same sort of shared
pictures in different company's catalogs. Back then they were often
grossly touched up (the touching up isn't usually so bad now). It was
common to see the same photo (or painting) reproduced with different coloring
two or three times on the same page! I remember that Gurney's (I think it
was Gurney's anyway), for many years used the same picture to show Sunburst
Honey Locust and Rubylace Honey Locust. One showed yellow foliage, and the
other was flipped around and showed red foliage, sometimes they were side by
side, and thought it was funny, but it never bothered me. At least there
was an attempt to make it look reasonably similar to the plant in
question.
In the case of this variegated Iris, I think the photo must be mislabeled
by Horticopia (or whoever is supplying it) and the people putting the catalogs
together (and probably the "nurseries" selling the plants) don't have a
clue. I do think it is very sad that the sellers don't even know what they
are selling. Now if they were really selling Iris pallida 'Variegata',
then the photo would be a good one. What's really funny, is that in past
years I have indeed seen I. pallida 'Variegata' for sale on the same page as
other variegated Iris (I. pseudacoris and I. laevigata), and yet this photo (or
one very like it) was still labeled as either I. pseudacoris or I. laevigata,
and never as I. pallida - go figure.
As for the general public. Most average people have very little
interest in plants (I found this to be true world wide) and most don't care what
the name is. When they order from the these catalogs they are ordering
something pretty for their yard, and will probably never notice the
difference. I'm not saying this excuses the misrepresentation (whether
intentional or not), but it does allow it to continue without too much
complaint.
Dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- References:
- General garden catalogs
- From: J* M* &*
- Re: General garden catalogs
- From: E* K* &*
- General garden catalogs
- Prev by Date: Re[2]: General garden catalogs
- Next by Date: Re: A suggestion.....
- Previous by thread: Re[2]: General garden catalogs
- Next by thread: General garden catalogs