Re: naming irises
- Subject: Re: naming irises
- From: "'JamieV.' j*@freenet.de [iris-species]" <i*@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:13:09 +0100
|
Are we all clear on the differences,
then. A clone is a specific genetic entity, while a cultivar is
not restricted to this degree. One could think of it as a refined
gene pool. It is important that one understands the difference as
a cultivar has a much broader reach.
How a cultivar is produced does not play a big role, so long as the offered entities meet the description. As to the F generation, Chuck, your professor is simply incorrect. You make no difference between animals and plants. It is a clear basic definition, and, as I noted, filial, which means brother/sisters, in short, direct relatives, is the keystone of the definition. If one wishes to further restrict this definition in their work, that is their option, but it does not change the definition in general. F2 is both selfing and between members of the F1 generation (and their parents, for that matter). It allows one to define on which sequential generation one is referring to and the relationships. Simply that it has become fashionable to work with direct in-breeding on the first level (selfing), it doesn't change F generation definitions. If one were to change the definition, it would make generations of previous work invalid! When I hear teachers/professors passing on such information as though it was an indelible truth, I am not surprised that many cannot grasp some of these very basic genetic concepts. Mind you, professors are human, as well, and pass on that which they have been taught, whether it reflects the rules or not. As to the registration of cultivar strains, yes, this is done, but I do not know of any defined strains under Iris or Hemerocallis, which does not mean it can't happen. Just hasn't reached this point. With Pardancanda norrisi (as ex) being consider as part of the genus Iris, a seed strain may well be registered. One must ask themselves, if it is a good idea. You do not need to register a strain to make it financially valid. You do it for posterity. Registration is not copyright. Or Patent, for that matter. I hope I am not ruffling too many feathers. I am simply speaking from decades of work with genetics and breeding. cheers, Jamie Am 05.02.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Chuck Chapman i*@aim.com [iris-species]:
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* P* '* r* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* C* i* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- References:
- Re: Re: naming irises
- From: &* P* '* r* [* &*
- Re: Re: naming irises
- From: &* j* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* C* i* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* j* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* [* &*
- Re: naming irises
- From: &* C* i* [* &*
- Re: Re: naming irises
- Prev by Date: Re: naming irises
- Next by Date: Re: naming irises
- Previous by thread: Re: naming irises
- Next by thread: Re: naming irises