SV: SPEC-X
- Subject: SV: SPEC-X
- From: L* H* <H*@privat.dk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:42:28 +0100
|
Hi Robert, Great stuff, but how do you see SP, SSP and var. and this clarification. Is SP the same as SPEC And SSP (subspecies) a ? And var. (variation) a variation of SP. SP, SSP and var. are the typical notations in botanical gardens. Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Lars HÃpfner Langengen 38, Svogerslev 4000Â Roskilde Denmark Fra: iris-species@yahoogroups.com [mailto:iris-species@yahoogroups.com] PÃ vegne af Robert Pries Since I am the last living authority on the subject I have prepared the attached document as a statement for history. The AIS may change things in the future but the definition that was approved by my committee should stand and I believe is a fair and workable definition. I has been criticized by people from all sides for 25 years, much like all the other AIS classes and awards but I think it has stood the test of time and no one has shown something better. From: "Kenneth Walker" <kenww@astound.net> As I recall, those who worked to create the category (I don't remember exactly who now) intended it to be a broad category for hybrid iris that did not fit well into other categories. This includes those that might be placed in another category but did not meet modern expectations despite being judged worthy of introduction by the hybridizer.
|
- References:
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: K* W* &*
- Re: SPEC-X [1 Attachment]
- From: "Robert Pries " <robertpries@embarqmail.com>
- Re: SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: AIS January/February Bulletin
- Previous by thread: Re: SPEC-X [1 Attachment]
- Next by thread: RE: SPEC-X

