Re: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [iris-species] Re: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- From: &* M* <n*@charter.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:54:35 -0000
--- In iris-species@yahoogroups.com, Robt R Pries <rpries@s...> wrote:
"As I understand it the current trend in botany and not provide a
proper botanical name for hybrids. In otherwords let the
horticulturalistr establish classification names without a botanical
name for horticultural groups."
Bob, when you mentioned "squalid" in reference to the question of the
use of "squalens" I posed--I thought, "Of course! How obvious."
That was very helpful.
Your comment above, addressed to Dave Ferguson, describes a trend I
welcome wholeheartedly. The use of *Iris Xaltobarbata* for TB
tetraploids makes far more sense than the often used *Iris
germanica,* which I have seen many places, among others at the NC
state Arboretum, less than three miles from the home I share with my
wife, Dorothy. Whenever I see *germanica* used in this way I cringe,
considering the *germanica* types are the 44-chromosome hybrids
between unreduced gametes from n=12 sources and the dwarf we used to
call *chamaeiris,* but the name of which now used I find slow to
surface. The hanging term changes on the memory framework seems more
difficult as one ages.
I have no argument with the use of *squalens* if we *must* use a name
for the diploid hybrids. I am bothered somewhat, however, at still
another redifinition of what once were quite specific terms--i.e.,
applying "amoena" to anything with white standards and colored falls
of whatever genetic constituion, where the term once refered only to
the specific genetic array responsible for the "Wabash" type, diploid
or tetraploid.
"Squalens" did also describe a whole lot of tetraploid, not just
diploid, blends in the days when the term was used to describe an AIS
category.
As to considering the diploid Eupogons as *only* hybrids between
*pallida* and *variegata* overlooks the slight but real possibility
of quite a number of other n=12 species possiby being in the mix.
I am greatly enjoying your comments and those of Dave Ferguson--
despite the academic "idle" time.
Neil Mogensen z 7 western NC mountains
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/2gGylB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
iris-species-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index