Re: Receiving attached photos

Ummm... mine were 276K, 300K, 300K, and 420K.  They were reduced significantly before sending them.  Sorry for the inconvenience, but I think these are reasonable file sizes.  Reducing them further would make them postage-stamp sized on some people's computers.  However, you are correct - it's just as easy for me to post them on the web as to send them via email, so I'd say that's a reasonable compromise.

Dennis in Cincinnati


At 12:55 PM 3/5/2005, you wrote:
Most of the iris photos posted are a pleasure to see. BUT I don't have a fast-downloading internet access line. Today there were four photos in the 896K size range - they took about 3-4 minutes each to download. I just sat there and got mad as my computer was tied up for so long.

PLEASE reduce the size of your photos to - say - 100K or less. They can look just as good as the larger size files. There is no need for such huge files (unless requested). Perhaps a link to a large photo would be sufficient.

Thanks

Steve Ayala
Petaluma



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

Yahoo! Groups Links

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here
Web Bug from http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2593423/rand=214079889

Yahoo! Groups Links
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index