Re: Re: I. pallida
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: I. pallida
- From: Robt R Pries r*@sbcglobal.net
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:37:57 -0800 (PST)
> “Seedlings show considerable variation in
color and it is for this reason that the claim of the Loppio form to a
varietal name is at least doubtful.”< When Dykes wrote this I am sure that he was referring to the fact that since the ‘Loppio’ seedlings did not necessarily perpetuate the dark color but showed the complete range of colors within pallida that it could not receive the status of a botanical variety which one would consider to be consistent on the trait that gives reason for the name. Do not confuse botanical variety with cultivar in this case. But this statement in know way implies that ‘Loppio’ is a hybrid.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
iris-species-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- References:
- Re: Re: I. pallida
- From: R* R* P*
- From: R* R* P*
- Re: Re: I. pallida
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: I. pallida
- Next by Date: Iris sintenisii v brandzae, trojana and taochia
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: I. pallida
- Next by thread: Re: Re: I. pallida