Re: Iris savannarum

 

They may have all been published in Addisonia. Some of them (and a couple of other articles by and about Small) are reprinted in the SLI's 50th Anniversary Publication 1941-1991. These have color "plates" by Mary E. Eaton.

Giganticearulea is not in that list because the SIGNA check list treats it as a species. Therefore it wasn't listed as a registration by Small.

R


From: "'Patrick O'Connor' pfoconnor@cox.net [iris-species]" <iris-species@yahoogroups.com>
To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: [iris-species] Iris savannarum

 
Rodney,
 
I have seen some many differing numbers cited as to how many Louisiana species Small named.  I have wondered how Small did the deed.   He published photos in Addisonia for one thing.  But I don’t really know the mechanism that would have been used to record the naming of a species.  I notice that giganticaerulea is not on the list you sent, so maybe there are other lists.   
 
Patrick
 
From: iris-species@yahoogroups.com [mailto:iris-species@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 10:51 AM
To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Iris savannarum
 
 
Here's that list of Small's irises. I just noticed that 'Shrevei' is on the list. That is obviously not and LA but rather considered a variant of I. virginica.
 
R
 
 
‘Acleantha’,  R. 1931,
‘Alabamensis’, R. 1932,
‘Albispiritis’, R. 1928;
‘Alticristata’, R. 1932;
‘Atrocyanea’, R. 1929;
‘Atroenantha’, R. 1931;
‘Auralata’, R. 1931;
‘Bazeti’, R. 1945;
‘Bifurcata’, R. 1931;
‘Brevipes’, R. 1932;
‘Chlorolopha’, R. 1931;
‘Chrysaeola’, 1929;
‘Chrysolopha’, R. 1932;
‘Chrysophoenicia’, 1929;
‘Citricristata’, R. 1931;
‘Citriviola’, R. 1931;
‘Cyanochrysea’, R. 1932;
‘Dewinkeleri’, R. 1931;
‘Elephantina’, R. 1931;
‘Flexicaulis’, 1927;
‘Fluviatilis’, R. 1932;
‘Fourchiana’, R. 1931;
‘Fulvaurea’, 1931;
‘Fumifulva’, R. 1931;
‘Fuscaurea’, R. 1931;
‘Fuscirosea’, R. 1931;
‘Fuscisanguinea’, R. 1931;
‘Fuscivenosa’, R. 1931;
‘Gentilliana’, R. 1931;
‘Iochroma’, R. 1931;
‘Io’cyanea’, R. 1931;
‘Kimballiae’, R. 1924;
‘Ludoviciana’, R. 1931;
‘Miraculosa’, R. 1928;
‘Moricolor’, R. 1931;
‘Oenantha’, R. 1931;
‘Parvirosea’, R. 1931;
‘Phoenicis’, R. 1932;
‘Pseudocristata’, R. 1931;
‘Purpurissata’, R. 1931;
‘Regalis’, R. 1931;
‘Rhodochrysea’, R. 1931;
‘Rivularis’, 1927;
‘Rosiflora’, R. 1931;
‘Rubicunda’, R. 1931;
‘Salmonicolor’, R. 1931;
‘Savannarum’, 1924;
‘Shrevei’; 1927;
‘Subfulva’, R. 1931;
‘Thomasii’, R. 1931;
‘Tyriana’, R. 1931;
‘Vernamont’, 1932;
‘Vinicolor’, R. 1927;
‘Violipurpurea’, R. 1929;
‘Violivenosa’, R. 1931;
‘Viridvinea’, R. 1931;
‘Wherryana’, R. 1931;
 
From: "Rodney Barton r*@yahoo.com [iris-species]" <i*@yahoogroups.com>
To: "i*@yahoogroups.com" <i*@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Iris savannarum
 
 
Interesting discussion on Dr. Small.


A few of tidbits:



The SIGNA check list lists 58 irises named by Small. (It treats all but giganticearulea as cultivars.) I assume these were all the ones he formally described.



As I recall he established a test garden at the NY botanical garden for his LA collections.



There is an literature review on the hexagonae by Philip W. Ogilvie in SIGNA #62. His conclusions (1998) are below.



Rod
 
"Conclusions: The evidence from the literature could be interpreted as supporting only
three species, conservatively: I. hexagona, I. fulva, and I. nelsonii. (According to this
reasoning I. hexagona would in turn be divided into eight subspecies: I. hexagona subsp.
hexagona, I. hexagona subsp. foliosa, I. hexagona subsp. savannarum, I. hexagona subsp.
kimballiae, 1. hexagona subsp. flexicaulis, I. hexagona subsp. rivularis, I. hexagone subsp.
albispiritus, and I. hexagona subsp. giganticaerulea. The literature may, with equal validity,
be understood to be supporting ten species: I. hexagona,I. fulva, I. foliosa, I. savannarum, I.
kimballiae, I. flexicaulis, I. rivularis, I. albispiritus, I. giganticaerulela, and I. nelsonii. Until
adequate field collecting and laboratory testing has been done to clearly demonstrate the
true relationships and levels of differentiation in this group, I believe the second scheme will
lead to less confusion."
 


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index