RE: [SPAM] Re: HYB: Iris purpureobractea
- Subject: RE: [SPAM] Re: HYB: Iris purpureobractea
- From: &* M* <f*@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:33:53 -0700
Tom,
His primary motivations at the time seem to have been both curiosity and the desire to increase the number of flowers on arilbred inflorescences.
I'll transcribe Harald's introduction in the article:
"Three closely related species of bearded iris show a potential for bringing improved branching into arilbred lines.
I am aware of the attitude of elite species iris enthusiasts: To hell with the pollen daubers who have an itching to mix up all and everything they can get their hands on. I am sorry, but I am one of those daubers, and the reason is pure curiosity. By the way, I am very glad to know some of the species enthusiasts. They are sometimes growing rarities I'd never thought possible, and to my surprise, I found them always to be very obliging and cooperative. Following are some of my experiences and observations on of the less-known bearded iris species, Iris schachtii, I. purpureobracteata, and I. junonia . . . ."
As to experiences with purpuerobractea, all he said was that the first clone he grew had disappointing lavender flowers and blotchy bract coloration, since he'd read of a superior ice-blue clone with more solidly colored bracts. Perhaps he's succeeded in attaining a better clone, 9 years on.
Jeff
|
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: "Improved" Iris tectorum
- Next by Date: Iris confusa or wattii?
- Previous by thread: Re: HYB: Iris purpureobractea
- Next by thread: RE: [SPAM] Re: HYB: Iris purpureobractea