Re: Re: SPEC-X

 

Again; SIGNA dropped the ball. When it came to Cal-sibes and especially Sino-Siberians and pseudacorus crosses with Ensata. Nany were not registered as SPEC-X. Even though SinoSiberians are very different than regular siberians they were registered as Siberians not Spec-X. Of course they did nothing because people compared them to the siberians they knew and were easier to grow. Early pseudacorus/ensata crosses were registered as Japanese not SPEC-X and of course were relegated to interesting footnotes. Many of the Irises of Tamberg which were very interesting crosses that even Dennis would like never made it into the USA. I have given people tools to promote all sorts of iris and instead they have ignored them for what they had always done.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean A. Zera" <zera@umich.edu>
To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:35:27 AM
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: SPEC-X

 

> Yet cal-sibs weren't even *eligible* for an AIS Dykes until 2003
> when the SPEC-X > class was created.

I see from subsequent comments that I mean first awarded, not created.

Sean Z.

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index