iris-species (by date)

Last updated: Tue Nov 30 23:48:02 2010
220 messages in chronological order

Listing format is the following:

Date Subject (# of follow-ups) F*

11/30/10 RE: Re: LAs? (0) C* C*
11/30/10 RE: Re: LAs? (1) E* H*
11/30/10 Re: Re: LAs? (1) g*
11/30/10 SV: SV: SV: Russian irises (0) L* H*
11/30/10 RE: SV: SV: Russian irises (1) E* H*
11/30/10 RE: Re: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/30/10 SV: SV: Russian irises (1) L* H*
11/30/10 Aphylla Werckmeister (0) E* H*
11/30/10 Re: Re: Unknown Spuria (1) Y* P*
11/30/10 RE: Re: LAs? (2) E* H*
11/30/10 Re: LAs? (1) C* H*
11/30/10 Re: bias? (0) T* W*
11/30/10 RE: Re: bias? (0) E* H*
11/30/10 RE: Re: bias? (1) E* H*
11/30/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) C*
11/30/10 Re: Re: bias? (3) d*
11/29/10 RE: Re: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/29/10 Re: Unknown Spuria (1) j*
11/29/10 RE: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/29/10 Unknown Spuria (1) D* S*
11/29/10 RE: SV: Russian irises (1) E* H*
11/29/10 Re: SV: Russian irises (1) D* H*
11/29/10 SV: Russian irises (0) L* H*
11/29/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) J* H*
11/29/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) C*
11/29/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/29/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) J*
11/28/10 RE: Re: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: Unknown Spuria (1) W* P*
11/28/10 Re: Unknown Spuria (1) D* H*
11/28/10 RE: Re: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Unknown Spuria (1) C* C*
11/28/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Unknown Spuria (1) j*
11/28/10 RE: Re: Unknown Spuria (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) T* W*
11/28/10 Re: Unknown Spuria (4) D* H*
11/28/10 Unknown Spuria (0) a*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* W*
11/28/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/28/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) S* A* Z*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) C*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) S* A* Z*
11/28/10 AIS Mission Statement (0) C*
11/28/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/28/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/28/10 Re: bias? (1) T* W*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) S* A* Z*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/28/10 Tet. CalSibes (0) E* H*
11/28/10 RE: Re: bias? (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) C*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) D* K*
11/28/10 RE: bias? (0) E* H*
11/28/10 RE: Re: award system (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) D* K*
11/28/10 Renewing AIS Membership (0) C*
11/28/10 RE: Re: award system (0) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) R* P*
11/28/10 Ideas about Judging (0) C*
11/28/10 RE: Re: bias? (1) E* H*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (2) D* K*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) R* P*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) C*
11/28/10 RE: bias? (1) C* C*
11/28/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) S* A* Z*
11/28/10 Re: Re: award system (1) C* C*
11/27/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) D* W*
11/27/10 Re: award system (3) C* H*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (2) T* W*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (1) T* W*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) S* A* Z*
11/27/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) S* A* Z*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (3) D* K*
11/27/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) C*
11/27/10 Re: Re: bias? (0) C*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (1) T* W*
11/27/10 Re: Re: bias? (1) C* C*
11/27/10 Re: SPEC-X (0) T* W*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (1) C*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (2) T* W*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (1) S* A* Z*
11/27/10 Re: bias? (0) A* M*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) C* C*
11/27/10 RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens (0) E* H*
11/27/10 bias? (3) T* W*
11/27/10 RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens (1) E* H*
11/27/10 RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens (1) C* C*
11/27/10 Re: REÂ: Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : (0) C* C*
11/27/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/27/10 RE: RE : Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : [ (0) E* H*
11/27/10 RE : Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : [iris (2) R* M*
11/27/10 Re: garden merit / MY2CENTS (0) g*
11/27/10 Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : garden me (1) D* K*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* K*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) C*
11/27/10 RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens (1) E* H*
11/27/10 RE : [iris-species] garden merit (0) R* M*
11/27/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) S* A* Z*
11/27/10 Re: garden merit (1) D* W*
11/27/10 RE: Spec-x (0) a*
11/27/10 RE: garden merit (0) E* H*
11/27/10 Re: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens (1) R* P*
11/27/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) K* W*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) A* M*
11/27/10 Re: garden merit (2) R* P*
11/27/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/27/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* F*
11/26/10 RE: garden merit (0) P* A*
11/26/10 RE: garden merit (1) P* A*
11/26/10 RE: OT WHO KNOWS EXCEL WELL? (0) C* H*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) C*
11/26/10 RE: Russian irises (0) L* B*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (3) C* C*
11/26/10 Re: Russian irises (0) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 RE: Russian irises (0) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Russian irises (1) D* W*
11/26/10 RE: Russian irises (0) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Russian irises (5) Y* P*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/26/10 RE: garden merit (0) E* H*
11/26/10 RE: garden merit (1) D* H*
11/26/10 RE: garden merit (1) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) C*
11/26/10 garden merit (2) D* W*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) g*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) R* P*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* W*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) R* P*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/26/10 Russian irises (1) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) S* A* Z*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) J*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) J*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) C* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) J*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) C* H*
11/26/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* K*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) J*
11/26/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (3) D* K*
11/25/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) C* C*
11/25/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) J*
11/25/10 Re: SPEC-X (2) C* C*
11/25/10 Re: AIS Awards was SPEC-X (0) C* C*
11/25/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/25/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/25/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/25/10 Re: AIS Award System was SPEC-X (0) C* C*
11/25/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/25/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) P* A*
11/25/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) T* W*
11/24/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) g*
11/24/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (1) D* H*
11/24/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) P* A*
11/24/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (4) S* A* Z*
11/24/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) D* W*
11/24/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (2) D* F*
11/24/10 RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (0) C* C*
11/24/10 RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (0) D* F*
11/24/10 RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (1) D* F*
11/23/10 Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (0) C* C*
11/23/10 RE: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (0) C* C*
11/23/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) D* K*
11/23/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (0) D* K*
11/23/10 RE: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) W* P*
11/23/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/23/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (2) E* H*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (2) T* W*
11/23/10 SV: SPEC-X (0) L* H*
11/23/10 Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (1) B* C*
11/23/10 SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (2) L* H*
11/23/10 Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (2) R* P*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (0) R* P*
11/23/10 RE: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (1) E* H*
11/23/10 RE: SPEC-X rebloomer (1) C* C*
11/23/10 RE: SPEC-X (1) E* H*
11/23/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (2) D* K*
11/23/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (2) R* P*
11/23/10 RE: Re: SPEC-X (0) E* H*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (2) C* C*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) D* K*
11/23/10 Re: Re: SPEC-X (1) R* P*
11/23/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) P* A*
11/22/10 Re: SPEC-X (0) T* W*
11/22/10 Re: SPEC-X (1) B* C*
11/22/10 SPEC-X (1) T* W*
11/20/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) E* H*
11/20/10 Re: I. tectorum (1) D* &* M* M*
11/19/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) E* H*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (1) J* C*
11/19/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) G* M*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (0) K* W*
11/19/10 RE: I. tectorum (1) E* H*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (1) J* M*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (1) D* &* M* M*
11/19/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) C* C*
11/19/10 RE: I. tectorum (3) E* H*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (0) R* P*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (1) C* C*
11/19/10 Re: I. tectorum (2) R* P*
11/18/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) P* A*
11/18/10 RE: I. tectorum (0) G* M*
11/18/10 I. tectorum (3) R* B*
11/08/10 visiting Los Angeles (please reply off- (0) D* K*
11/06/10 a Pacific Coast Iris group (0) D* W*

Other mailing lists