iris-species (by date)
Last updated: Tue Nov 30 23:48:02 2010220 messages in chronological order
Listing format is the following:
-
Date
Subject
(# of follow-ups)
F*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: LAs?
(0) C* C*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: LAs?
(1) E* H*
-
11/30/10
Re: Re: LAs?
(1) g*
-
11/30/10
SV: SV: SV: Russian irises
(0) L* H*
-
11/30/10
RE: SV: SV: Russian irises
(1) E* H*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/30/10
SV: SV: Russian irises
(1) L* H*
-
11/30/10
Aphylla Werckmeister
(0) E* H*
-
11/30/10
Re: Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) Y* P*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: LAs?
(2) E* H*
-
11/30/10
Re: LAs?
(1) C* H*
-
11/30/10
Re: bias?
(0) T* W*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: bias?
(0) E* H*
-
11/30/10
RE: Re: bias?
(1) E* H*
-
11/30/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) C*
-
11/30/10
Re: Re: bias?
(3) d*
-
11/29/10
RE: Re: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/29/10
Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) j*
-
11/29/10
RE: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/29/10
Unknown Spuria
(1) D* S*
-
11/29/10
RE: SV: Russian irises
(1) E* H*
-
11/29/10
Re: SV: Russian irises
(1) D* H*
-
11/29/10
SV: Russian irises
(0) L* H*
-
11/29/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) J* H*
-
11/29/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) C*
-
11/29/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/29/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) J*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) W* P*
-
11/28/10
Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) D* H*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) C* C*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Unknown Spuria
(1) j*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: Unknown Spuria
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) T* W*
-
11/28/10
Re: Unknown Spuria
(4) D* H*
-
11/28/10
Unknown Spuria
(0) a*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* W*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) C*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) S* A* Z*
-
11/28/10
AIS Mission Statement
(0) C*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/28/10
Re: bias?
(1) T* W*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) S* A* Z*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/28/10
Tet. CalSibes
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: bias?
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) C*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) D* K*
-
11/28/10
RE: bias?
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: award system
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) D* K*
-
11/28/10
Renewing AIS Membership
(0) C*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: award system
(0) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) R* P*
-
11/28/10
Ideas about Judging
(0) C*
-
11/28/10
RE: Re: bias?
(1) E* H*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(2) D* K*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) R* P*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) C*
-
11/28/10
RE: bias?
(1) C* C*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) S* A* Z*
-
11/28/10
Re: Re: award system
(1) C* C*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) D* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: award system
(3) C* H*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(2) T* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(1) T* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(3) D* K*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) C*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: bias?
(0) C*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(1) T* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: bias?
(1) C* C*
-
11/27/10
Re: SPEC-X
(0) T* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(1) C*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(2) T* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/27/10
Re: bias?
(0) A* M*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) C* C*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens
(0) E* H*
-
11/27/10
bias?
(3) T* W*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens
(1) E* H*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens
(1) C* C*
-
11/27/10
Re: REÂ: Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE :
(0) C* C*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/27/10
RE: RE : Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : [
(0) E* H*
-
11/27/10
RE : Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : [iris
(2) R* M*
-
11/27/10
Re: garden merit / MY2CENTS
(0) g*
-
11/27/10
Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : garden me
(1) D* K*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* K*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) C*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens
(1) E* H*
-
11/27/10
RE : [iris-species] garden merit
(0) R* M*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/27/10
Re: garden merit
(1) D* W*
-
11/27/10
RE: Spec-x
(0) a*
-
11/27/10
RE: garden merit
(0) E* H*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: Test-Display-Collection Gardens
(1) R* P*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) K* W*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) A* M*
-
11/27/10
Re: garden merit
(2) R* P*
-
11/27/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/27/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* F*
-
11/26/10
RE: garden merit
(0) P* A*
-
11/26/10
RE: garden merit
(1) P* A*
-
11/26/10
RE: OT WHO KNOWS EXCEL WELL?
(0) C* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) C*
-
11/26/10
RE: Russian irises
(0) L* B*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(3) C* C*
-
11/26/10
Re: Russian irises
(0) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
RE: Russian irises
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Russian irises
(1) D* W*
-
11/26/10
RE: Russian irises
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Russian irises
(5) Y* P*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: garden merit
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: garden merit
(1) D* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: garden merit
(1) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) C*
-
11/26/10
garden merit
(2) D* W*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) g*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) R* P*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* W*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) R* P*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/26/10
Russian irises
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) S* A* Z*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) J*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) J*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) C* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) J*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) C* H*
-
11/26/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* K*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) J*
-
11/26/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(3) D* K*
-
11/25/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) C* C*
-
11/25/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) J*
-
11/25/10
Re: SPEC-X
(2) C* C*
-
11/25/10
Re: AIS Awards was SPEC-X
(0) C* C*
-
11/25/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/25/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/25/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/25/10
Re: AIS Award System was SPEC-X
(0) C* C*
-
11/25/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/25/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) P* A*
-
11/25/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) T* W*
-
11/24/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) g*
-
11/24/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* H*
-
11/24/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) P* A*
-
11/24/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(4) S* A* Z*
-
11/24/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) D* W*
-
11/24/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(2) D* F*
-
11/24/10
RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(0) C* C*
-
11/24/10
RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(0) D* F*
-
11/24/10
RE: SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(1) D* F*
-
11/23/10
Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(0) C* C*
-
11/23/10
RE: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(0) C* C*
-
11/23/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) D* K*
-
11/23/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(0) D* K*
-
11/23/10
RE: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) W* P*
-
11/23/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/23/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(2) E* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(2) T* W*
-
11/23/10
SV: SPEC-X
(0) L* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(1) B* C*
-
11/23/10
SV: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(2) L* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(2) R* P*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(0) R* P*
-
11/23/10
RE: RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(1) E* H*
-
11/23/10
RE: SPEC-X rebloomer
(1) C* C*
-
11/23/10
RE: SPEC-X
(1) E* H*
-
11/23/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(2) D* K*
-
11/23/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(2) R* P*
-
11/23/10
RE: Re: SPEC-X
(0) E* H*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(2) C* C*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) D* K*
-
11/23/10
Re: Re: SPEC-X
(1) R* P*
-
11/23/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) P* A*
-
11/22/10
Re: SPEC-X
(0) T* W*
-
11/22/10
Re: SPEC-X
(1) B* C*
-
11/22/10
SPEC-X
(1) T* W*
-
11/20/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) E* H*
-
11/20/10
Re: I. tectorum
(1) D* &* M* M*
-
11/19/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) E* H*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(1) J* C*
-
11/19/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) G* M*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(0) K* W*
-
11/19/10
RE: I. tectorum
(1) E* H*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(1) J* M*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(1) D* &* M* M*
-
11/19/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) C* C*
-
11/19/10
RE: I. tectorum
(3) E* H*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(0) R* P*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(1) C* C*
-
11/19/10
Re: I. tectorum
(2) R* P*
-
11/18/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) P* A*
-
11/18/10
RE: I. tectorum
(0) G* M*
-
11/18/10
I. tectorum
(3) R* B*
-
11/08/10
visiting Los Angeles (please reply off-
(0) D* K*
-
11/06/10
a Pacific Coast Iris group
(0) D* W*
Other mailing lists