Re: Re: SPEC-X

Subject: Re: Re: SPEC-X
From: D* K* <d*@badbear.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:21:29 -0500

I like it! This explanation makes sense! And it explains why bearded irises qualify as SPEC-X.

But I'm still only interested in the first section. I like the weird, new, cutting edge stuff. I have enough bearded irises. I don't want more bearded irises. I'm not interested in bearded irises.

Seeing them registered as SPEC-X is not going to sway me. I'm just going to ignore them and look for the "real" SPEC-X irises now on the market.

Dennis in Cincinnati

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:08 PM, El Hutchison <e*@mymts.net> wrote:

The SPEC-X class serves two functions: 1) to provide a category and awards system for irises involving more than one species that do not meet the requirements of any other existing class, and 2) to encourage creative use of species in breeding, especially when the resulting plants do not neatly conform to the expectations of existing classes.

References:
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
  - From: R* P* &*
- Re: SPEC-X
  - From: &* W* &*
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
  - From: E* H* &*

Prev by Date: RE: SPEC-X
Next by Date: Re: Re: SPEC-X
Previous by thread: RE: Re: SPEC-X
Next by thread: RE: Re: SPEC-X

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index